U.S. Politics

In One Rocky Week, Trump’s Self-Inflicted Chaos on Vivid Display

After another week of controversies, President Trump planned a weekend at Mar-a-Lago.

© Al Drago/The New York Times After another week of controversies, President Trump planned a weekend at Mar-a-Lago.

MSN News

WASHINGTON — Minutes before President Trump was to take the stage in Nashville last week to make his case for the health care overhaul he had promised, he received some unwelcome news that shifted his script.

A federal district court judge in Hawaii had just placed another stay on his ban on travelers from six predominantly Muslim countries, dealing his order a second legal setback in two months. As a country music duo crooned in an auditorium still filling with adoring supporters of Mr. Trump, the president fumed backstage and huddled with his staff for a hasty re-drafting of the speech.

When Mr. Trump emerged, he decided to relegate the health care overhaul, which he has identified as a top domestic priority, to a brief mention more than halfway through the speech. He instead replaced its prime billing with an angry diatribe against the travel ban ruling and the judge who had issued it.

“I have to be nice, otherwise I’ll get criticized for speaking poorly about our courts,” Mr. Trump said. But he could not help himself: The president soon suggested the court that had just ruled against him should be destroyed. “People are screaming, ‘Break up the Ninth Circuit!’ ”

Once again, Mr. Trump’s agenda was subsumed by problems of his own making, his message undercut by a seemingly endless stream of controversy he cannot seem to stop himself from feeding.

The health care measure appears on track for a House vote this coming week, and the president, who planned a weekend of relaxation at Mar-a-Lago, his Palm Beach, Fla., club, is likely to receive a large measure of the credit. But it has also become clear that Mr. Trump, an agitator incapable of responding proportionately to any slight, appears hellbent on squandering his honeymoon.

Instead, he has sowed chaos in his own West Wing, and talked or tweeted his way into trouble, over and over again.

That was never more apparent than over the last week, when fresh questions about his refusal to release his tax returns and the blocking of his executive order sapped the spotlight from his efforts to build support for the health measure and even the unveiling of his first budget.

Even more self-lacerating: his insistence that President Barack Obama authorized surveillance on his 2016 campaign, which continued unabated despite rebukes from Republicans, denials by the congressional intelligence committees, and the complaints of the British government, which demanded an apology after Mr. Trump’s spokesman suggested one of its intelligence agencies had aided in the spying.

“It’s a pattern with him — he sometimes counterpunches so hard he hits himself,” said Ari Fleischer, a former White House press secretary for George W. Bush.

The public outbursts are mirrored by internal tensions. With the embers of the old rivalry between his chief strategist, Stephen K. Bannon, and chief of staff, Reince Priebus, extinguished, a new realignment has emerged in a West Wing already rived by suspicion and intrigue.

Gary Cohn, the former Goldman Sachs executive who serves as the president’s top economic policy adviser and who is decidedly more liberal than the rest of Mr. Trump’s inner circle, is on the rise, and has the ear of the president’s powerful son-in-law, Jared Kushner. Mr. Kushner also gained an ally on the National Security Council with the appointment of Dina Powell, a Republican and another former Goldman official who worked with Mr. Cohn, as a deputy for strategy.

In the newness of the administration, the constant need to tend to internal dynamics has been a distraction. The aides have watched each other warily and tried tending to the president’s base of supporters amid a sea of appointments of people who worked on Wall Street.

Frustration in D.C.

Mr. Trump is not bothered by turf battles in his administration. He believes they foster competition and keep any one aide from accumulating too much power. He is even more enthusiastic about waging war publicly, believing that it fires up his white working-class base.

Indeed, in Nashville on Wednesday night, Mr. Trump spoke to a rapturous crowd of almost 10,000 people and his embattled spokesman, Sean Spicer, was greeted as a star by awe-struck supporters, who spent several minutes crowding around him for pictures and to pat him on the back.

But in Washington, some Republican lawmakers and officials have watched in dismay and frustration, they say privately, because the president they are looking to for cover and salesmanship of the health care overhaul keeps getting sidetracked.

One of those diversions came after the judge’s ruling on the travel ban. In Nashville, the president said he would prefer to go back to his first, more restrictive ban and pursue it to the Supreme Court. “That’s what I wanted to do in the first place,” Mr. Trump said, a statement that seems destined to be used against his own lawyers in upcoming court cases on the executive order.

For Mr. Trump, this was supposed to be a week of pivoting and message discipline. The president read from a script during public appearances and posted on Twitter less often. He invited lawmakers from both parties to the White House for strategy sessions on the health measure. He scheduled policy speeches, like one near Detroit, where he announced he was halting fuel economy standards imposed by Mr. Obama, and the rally in Nashville, where he visited the grave of Andrew Jackson, the populist patron selected by his history-minded political impresario, Mr. Bannon, as Mr. Trump’s presidential analog.

But by Friday, as Mr. Trump worked to call attention to his powers of persuasion in securing commitments from a dozen wavering Republicans to back the health measure, the White House was left frantically trying to explain why Mr. Spicer had repeated allegations that the Government Communications Headquarters, the British spy agency, had helped to eavesdrop on the president during the campaign.

Rather than expressing regret for a slight of one of the United States’ strongest allies, Mr. Trump was unapologetic.

“We said nothing,” he said at a news conference with Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany. “All we did was quote a certain very talented legal mind who was the one responsible for saying that on television,” he added, referring to Andrew Napolitano, the commentator who first leveled the charge about the involvement of the British intelligence service on Fox News.

That did not seem to be enough for the irate British, who had called the charge “nonsense” and “utterly ridiculous.” Shepard Smith, a Fox News anchor, later disavowed it as well, saying his network could not back up Mr. Napolitano’s claims.

The episode left little time for talk of Mr. Trump’s “America First” budget released on Thursday, filled with domestic spending cuts so deep that even his budget director conceded they would be unpopular, or the health care measure that would affect more than 20 percent of the economy.

“This White House is on two tracks,” Mr. Fleischer said. “The legislative one, which has been surprisingly and pleasantly productive, and the other one full of self-induced error.”

The problem for Mr. Trump, he added, is that the self-destructive behavior, if it continues, threatens to overshadow everything else.

“He has a tremendous number of ingredients at his disposal to be a very successful president,” Mr. Fleischer added, “but he might not even get credit for it if he is so red-hot controversial.”

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS and MAGGIE HABERMAN

5 thoughts on “In One Rocky Week, Trump’s Self-Inflicted Chaos on Vivid Display

  1. Also propaganda war effective whether within US or with outside world One example is that Occupy Democrats has every one hating Trump for cutting meals on wheels. There is no truth to that at all.

    Like

  2. Perhaps soldiers and tanks and ships and airplanes are no longer the measure of military strength. A cyber attack could shut everything down in a country. One atomic bomb set high above ground could disrupt the entire magnetic grid of the US.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I started writing a critique about your points and then I realized, “he’s right” (to a certain extent.) There will be conventional threats to our allies and conventional ways of aiding them will still exist…thus we do need our conventional means to do so. But you’re right in that the Russians have “upped the game” ten-fold with their crippling cyber attack on the United States and their manipulative INSTALLATION of Trump.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I fear biological attack by small group poisoning the water for instance or able to release disease carrying insects. I wanted my doctor to immunize my grandchildren for small pox. Seems we’ve stopped doing it for decades as it has been “eradicated”. I told him about bio war and he said there isn’t anyone who has or stores the vaccine anywhere.Well the chemical weapons storehouses are out there. Are we in trouble or what ! I think our space shuttle efforts are more than scientific. Whoever knocks out the other nation’s satellites first destroys the other side missile delivery systems. Seems a lot can be shut down by neutralizing satellites. Nukes should be eliminated by sensible nations. Let off a dozen or two of those and the whole atmosphere become contaminated making the planet uninhabitable.The under reported continued spewing of radiation from Fukishima, Japan is doing that every day and that is the most immediate threat to the world. I believe the US has enough non nuke capability not to need them anymore. In addition the last several presidents had the opportunity to destroy N Korea’s nuke program by preemptive strike but now that seems no longer possible because they can still hurt S Korea, Japan and other neighbors without long range nukes. We were terrified in Miami during the Cuban Missile Crisis. We all ought to just as uncomfortable today.

        I’m not sure we can say they “installed” Trump. The Russian #2 or right hand Putin guy recently stated clearly that of course Russia prefers Trump with words to the effect “why would we want Clinton who says Russia is the root of all evil when Trump speaks of working together ?”. Unless they could have rigged voting machines what else could they do ? Putin understands money. Trump is a capitalist and perhaps interaction between money men increase interdependence reducing possibility of war. With all his secret money stashes it has been presented that it is Putin who is the richest man in the world.

        As far as defending Europe(Ukraine too) I would supply the forces with hand held anti vehicle rockets. Knocking out trucks and tanks is effective and very expensive for the invader.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s