U.S. Politics

Trump Decides To Gut United Nations Funding By 50 Percent, Embarrassing And Endangering America On The World Stage

Trump Decides To Gut United Nations Funding By 50 Percent, Embarrassing And Endangering America On The World Stage



By Stephen D Foster Jr

Donald Trump has decided to go through with his threat to defund the United Nations in retaliation for making a decision he didn’t like.

America has been the foremost leader on the international stage ever since World War II. After the war, the United States led the way in creating a more united and cooperative world by founding the United Nations to serve as a peacekeeping and humanitarian organization.

The United Nations headquarters in located in New York and America has veto power and a seat on the prestigious United Nations Security Council.

But now Donald Trump is preparing to slash funding to the United Nations by 50 percent, a move that would be a major blow against international cooperation and our reputation around the globe.

Not only will the United Nations be cut by $5 billion, Trump’s plan also makes a 37 percent cut to the State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development budgets.

And it’s all in an effort by Trump to increase the already bloated military budget.

United Nations expert Richard Gowan warned that cutting the funding would cause chaos and could cause agencies and programs within the United Nations to implode as other countries struggle to fill the gaps.

“Cutting the U.S. contribution would leave a gaping hole that other big donors would struggle to fill,” Gowan said. “Multiply that across other humanitarian agencies, like the World Food Program, and you are basically talking about the breakdown of the international humanitarian system as we know it.”

Indeed, the budget cuts could be devastating to the United Nations and threaten to bury international cooperation as we know it.

Republicans have even drafted a bill directing Trump to withdraw the United States from the organization entirely.

That means the United States would also be withdrawing from the World Bank, the International Court of Justice, the World Health Organization, the International Monetary Fund, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), and the International Atomic Energy Agency, among many others.

And because the United States is cutting funding, the United Nations may look to China or Russia to replace the funding, which could pave the way for a new power structure as the United States withdraws support.

It’s not only a serious blow to humanitarian efforts and global peacekeeping efforts, it’s a serious rejection of international diplomacy and cooperation.

And it’s all because Trump and Republicans did not like that the United Nations passed a resolution condemning the continued building of Israeli settlements on Palestinian territory even though such resolutions have passed before.

Trump is literally defunding the United Nations because they didn’t comply with his demands despite the fact that President Obama was still in office at the time.

This is absolutely humiliating for the United States and it should horrify the American people that Trump is withdrawing our country from the international community. Our influence and respect throughout the world will wane because of this decision and it will be difficult to regain it.

America is once again becoming an isolationist nation, and the last time we ignored the world around us over 100 million people were killed in two world wars. By ignoring the world again and the growing humanitarian crisis, we are paving the way for World War III. And make no mistake, such a war today will make the first two world wars look like minor skirmishes.

6 thoughts on “Trump Decides To Gut United Nations Funding By 50 Percent, Embarrassing And Endangering America On The World Stage

  1. The US should completely withdraw from the UN before it becomes a slave or a pawn to the so-called “International Community” and the building the UN occupies should be converted into high end apartments or the whole thing should be leveled and replaced by a public park or an industrial complex.


  2. “In oral and written testimony, Schaefer provided the panel with other “stark” comparisons highlighting the disproportionate contributions provided by the U.S. in 2015, including:

    –More than half the U.N.’s membership will be assessed less than $1 million each for both budgets (compared to $3.024 billion for the U.S. alone).

    –The 119 members of the Non-Aligned Movement together will account for around $490 million (compared to $3.024 billion for the U.S. alone).

    –The 56 countries of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) – which include 10 of the world’s 20 top oil-producing nations – will together contribute around $360 million (compared to $3.024 billion for the U.S. alone).

    –The other four permanent members of the U.N. Security Council – Russia, China, Britain and France – will together account for around $2.523 billion (compared to $3.024 billion for the U.S. alone).”



  3. The United States pays over 22% of the U.N’s budget, more than 185 other countries. The next closest country is Japan at 10%, followed by Germany at 7%, France, Britain, and China at 5%, and Italy at 4%. (Percentages based on 2015 sources). Say what you will about politics, but as a taxpayer I believe that other countries need to increase their funding, specifically the P5. You want an international organization, then you need international participation.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s