U.S. Politics

Republican responsible for investigating Michael Flynn wants to investigate leaks instead

Republican responsible for investigating Michael Flynn wants to investigate leaks instead

Image Credit: Rick Bowmer/AP | Rep. Jason Chaffetz

POLICY.MIC

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, said Wednesday night he was ready to recommend an investigation of recently resigned national security adviser Michael Flynn’s pre-inaugural phone call with Russian ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak.

More specifically, an investigation not of President Donald Trump‘s ties to Russia, but to find out who blew the whistle on Flynn and punish them.

In an interview with Fox News, Chaffetz told host Martha MacCallum “no matter where you are on the political spectrum, you cannot have classified information migrating out into a non-classified setting.”

“You have a duty and an obligation, because by its very nature, if that classified information gets out there, it can harm somebody,” Chaffetz added. “It can kill somebody.”

Source: Evan Vucci/AP

Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, said Wednesday night he was ready to recommend an investigation of recently resigned national security adviser Michael Flynn’s pre-inaugural phone call with Russian ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak.

More specifically, an investigation not of President Donald Trump‘s ties to Russia, but to find out who blew the whistle on Flynn and punish them.

In an interview with Fox News, Chaffetz told host Martha MacCallum “no matter where you are on the political spectrum, you cannot have classified information migrating out into a non-classified setting.”

“You have a duty and an obligation, because by its very nature, if that classified information gets out there, it can harm somebody,” Chaffetz added. “It can kill somebody.”

In a Wednesday night letter from Chaffetz and House Committee on the Judiciary chairman Rep. Bob Goodlatte, the two representatives told Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz they had “serious concerns about the potential inadequate protection of classified information” and requested he “begin an immediate investigation into whether classified information was mishandled here.”

Earlier in the day, Chaffetz had suggested the broader issue of Flynn’s call was “taking care of itself.”

dupree

In other words, rather than probe whether Flynn’s conversation about sanctions with Kislyak was connected to other leaks indicating Trump’s campaign was in repeated contact with Russian spies, Chaffetz wants to find whoever told Washington Post reporter David Ignatius about the call.

As the Intercept noted, whoever leaked the call likely did commit a felony — and may have been one of Flynn’s enemies rather than a benevolent party. Regardless, its release to the public has added yet more pressure around concerns there is something untoward connecting Trump’s praise of Russian President Vladimir Putin and the hacks of Democratic Party targets during the presidential election.

So far, Chaffetz’ unwillingness to investigate those concerns has mirrored the approach of most of his fellow Republicans. But that unwillingness does not come without political consequences. At a recent town hall meeting in Salt Lake City, Chaffetz was greeted with a horde of angry constituents demanding he investigate the president’s ties to Russia and his numerous other conflicts of interest.

Tom McKay

3 thoughts on “Republican responsible for investigating Michael Flynn wants to investigate leaks instead

  1. d to other leaks indicating Trump’s campaign was in repeated contact with Russian spies, C

    The word “spies” should not be thrown around lightly. It makes readers think they were working with “spies”. How do they know the contacts were spies and not mere Russian officials ? He states “spies” as a fact. It seems they would want to have contacts in place which seems reasonable when dealing with the 2nd most powerful country on earth. Now I am not smart enough to know if conversations legal or not but the use of the word “spies” is not objective journalism. It shows the writer has an agenda which would justify a Trump railing against the press.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s