FULL-BLOWN CRAZY: John Sununu: ‘I Wish This President Would Learn How To Be An American’

John Sununu Obama

Romney surrogate John Sununu has gone completely bat*hit insaneSee video here

The Huffington Post

In the span of one morning, top Mitt Romney surrogate John Sununu referred to President Obama as dumb and stupid, called the Chicago political culture from which he came “corrupt,” brought up Obama’s admitted use of marijuana as a kid in Hawaii, resurfaced the name of Tony Rezko — the jailed financier with ties to Obama — and then questioned the president’s Americanness.

It was a tour-de-force performance for the former New Hampshire governor, whose demonstrated willingness to throw punches has made him the wartime consigliere for the Romney campaign. But moments after Sununu said on a conference call Tuesday morning that he wished Obama “would learn how to be an American,” he tried to clarify and downplay the remark.

“What I thought I said but I guess I didn’t say is that the president has to learn the American formula for creating business,” Sununu said. “The American formula for creating business is not to have the government create business.”

Sununu’s meandering explanation that he instead was referring to Obama’s economic credentials seems a sign that the Romney campaign is still searching for a strategy to direct the political conversation away from Romney’s tax returns and his time at Bain Capital. But the idea that Sununu had misspoken seemed to conflict with an earlier appearance he made on Fox News in which he unleashed similarly personal swipes against the president, including hitting his past admission of smoking marijuana as a teenager in Hawaii.

“This guy doesn’t understand how to create jobs. So there is no surprise — there should be because of that statement no surprise on why he failed so miserably over the last four years, in terms of job creation,” Sununu said on Fox.

“He has no idea how the American system functions, and we shouldn’t be surprised about that, because he spent his early years in Hawaii smoking something, spent the next set of years in Indonesia, another set of years in Indonesia,” he said. “And, frankly, when he came to the U.S. he worked as a community organizer, which is a socialized structure, and then got into politics in Chicago.”

On the later conference call, Sununu also responded to demands that Romney release more years of tax returns.

“It just shows how stupid the Obama campaign is to think that someone who has been a public businessman all his life and governor of Massachusetts — if he didn’t pay his returns, you don’t think the IRS would be knocking at his door?” he said. (Romney didn’t release his tax returns in his 1994 run for U.S. Senate or his 2002 runs for governor.)

Continue here…

Tuesday Blog Round Up – 7-17-2012

The Chronicles of Mitt: July 16, 2012

Senate Republicans Filibuster DISCLOSE Act

Report: Obama needs better than 2004 black turnout

5 Questions for the Fact-Checkers on Romney and Bain

Voter ID Laws Are the Last Gasp of a Fading GOP Strategy

Democrats Mock GOP For Protecting Own Health Care In Repeal Vote

Obama Hate Hits a New Low: Qur’an Burner Terry Jones Digs Obama’s Grave

Romney’s Implosion Triggers an Epic Rush Limbaugh Obama Hate Meltdown

Jon Stewart mocks Romney: ‘Retroactive retirement’ worst use of a time machine ever

Seven Tea Party Freshmen Spent More Than $100,000 In Taxpayer Money On Personal Cars

How Romney ‘retroactively retired’ from Bain: 4 takeaways

Mitt Romney’s predilection for secrecy may turn out to be a major problem for his campaign…

The Week

Team Romney tries to explain how he was technically the CEO of Bain Capital for much longer than previously stated, but its story only further muddies the waters

Under attack from President Obama’s re-election campaign, Mitt Romney has been forced to defend and clarify his tenure at Bain Capital, the private equity firm he founded. This weekend, a top aide, Ed Gillespie, claimed that Romney “retroactively retired” from Bain in 1999, even though SEC documents show that Romney was the CEO of Bain through 2002. Romney’s departure date is considered important because Bain, which made huge profits buying out other companies, has been accused of forcing its properties to lay off workers and outsource jobs between 1999 and 2002. Romney claims he made no day-to-day decisions at Bain after 1999, but new reports continue to surface suggesting that Romney did indeed maintain ties to the company. Here, 4 takeaways from Romney’s efforts to defuse this increasingly compromising issue:

1. Romney has failed to put the issue behind him
Gillespie “didn’t do his boss any favors,” says Caroline Bankoff at New York. The claim that Romney “retroactively retired” is a “laugher, even by Washington standards,” says Democratic strategist Bill Buck at CBS Boston. Gillespie’s unique phrasing, which suggests that Romney is “taking advantage of some kind of loophole in the space-time continuum,” will hardly quell the insistent questions about his departure date, says Steve Benen at The Maddow Blog.

2. Romney is coming off as slippery
“Retroactive” may technically be the “correct way to characterize Romney’s retirement,” since the campaign claims that his involvement in the 1999 Salt Lake City Winter Olympics evolved from a temporary leave of absence to a full-time job, says Steve Kornacki at Salon. But politically, the phrase is “slippery and comically legalistic, sort of like Bill Clinton expounding on the meaning of the word ‘is,’ or John Kerry explaining how he ‘actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it.'” The line “could encourage casual voters who know little or nothing of the Bain story to assume that Romney is trying to cover his tracks for something embarrassing.”

3. Romney supported outsourcing before 1999
Bain was a pioneer in the outsourcing trend well before 1999, says Alec MacGillis at The New Republic. The layoffs and actual outsourcing may have occurred after his “retroactive” departure, but “for many of the investments in question the line traces very definitely to the pre-’99 period.” Indeed, Bain invested “heavily in firms that did not simply send some jobs overseas but specialized in offshoring.” In this respect, it really doesn’t matter whether Romney left Bain in 1999 or 2002.

4. Romney must take responsibility for Bain
Romney should acknowledge that “Bain was in the business of making companies more efficient and profitable,” which sometimes necessarily led to downsizing and outsourcing, says David Frum at CNN. It may not be pretty, but “it’s precisely the relentless search for profitability that causes economies to grow in the first place.” It’s an argument that “is not only convincing but has the additional merit of being true,” and it’s certainly better than letting Gillespie and other aides blast his “own side with lethal friendly fire.”