Regardless of what side you come down on the Bradley Manning or Edward Snowden cases, the author of this article makes a valid point…
While Bradley Manning has been found not guilty of the most serious charge he faced – aiding the enemy – he has been ‘convicted’ by a military court on 19 counts, several of which fall under the Espionage Act.
To be clear: a soldier who served the public interest by exposing war crimes and revealing gross legal violations by our government, will face a maximum of 136 years behind bars, likely in solitary confinement.
This was my reaction upon hearing the verdict:
#Manning faces 136 years (maximum) for charges against him. Architects of torture & extrajudicial murders? They face the talk show circuit.
— David Harris-Gershon (@David_EHG) July 30, 2013
Seriously, I don’t want to hear any lectures about how Manning deserves this time because he “broke the law.”
If he had illegally tortured Guantanamo detainees for the CIA, or even orchestrated such torture programs – illegal per U.S. and international law – he could very well have been promoted, if not left alone.
The Manning verdict’s central message, aside from this obvious hypocrisy and the injustices underlying it, is this: if you are a whistleblower in this country, do what Edward Snowden did (and what Daniel Ellsberg suggests): flee America, and fast.
However, if you commit crimes in the name of the state? Bulk up your profile.
There’s a microphone waiting.
- Bradley Manning faces life in jail: an ugly moment in US history (theweek.co.uk)
- Pfc. Bradley Manning faces 136 years in military custody (news.techeye.net)
- Bradley Manning Is Not Guilty of ‘Aiding the Enemy,’ Still Faces Life in Prison (motherboard.vice.com)
- Speaking Out For Bradley Manning and Whistleblowers (goldenageofgaia.com)
- Bradley Manning and William Calley: Parallel Lives (conradbrunstrom.wordpress.com)
Apparently Edward Snowden left Hong Kong headed to Russia and by way of Cuba will head to South America. Needless to say it’s quite complicated and is beginning to sound like a game of “Where in the world is Carmen Diego?”
NSA leaker Edward Snowden was reportedly traveling to Ecuador on Sunday to pursue political asylum, and the question on many casual observers’ lips is: Why?
The move comes a year after the small South American nation offered WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange safe haven at its London embassy.
And Assange is now lending his support to Snowden.
“He is bound for a democratic nation via a safe route for the purposes of asylum, and is being escorted by diplomats and legal advisors from WikiLeaks,” the anti-secrecy group said in a statement, noting that they are giving the one-time CIA contractor legal counsel. “Once Mr. Snowden arrives in Ecuador his request will be formally processed.”
WikiLeaks said that Snowden — who is charged with espionage for allegedly leaking information about top-secret U.S. government surveillance programs — was “accompanied” by former Spanish judge Balthasar Garzon, who is WikiLeaks’ counsel and Assange’s personal lawyer.
It was not immediately obvious why, exactly, Snowden chose to seek asylum in Ecuador, although the country’s association with Assange may offer some clues, said Fordham Law School professor Andrew Kent.
“Ecuador clearly has some kind of history of sticking their finger in the eye of the United States on security issues,” Kent said.
Rafael Correa, Ecuador’s left-leaning third-term president, is a vocal critic of U.S. foreign policy and Western economic influence in Latin America. And he is part of a cadre of Latin American leaders — including Raúl Castro of Cuba and the late Hugo Chávez of Venezuela — perceived to have an anti-American political worldview.
A sense of political kinship often helps an asylum-seeker decide where to go, said Robert J. Anello, a New York attorney who has handled extradition cases.
“A lot of people choose a country where they think the government will be sympathetic,” Anello said.
Ecuador is among 109 countries that have a bilateral extradition treaty with the U.S., according to the State Department. However, the treaty does not specify espionage as an extraditable offense, Kent said.
“There’s nothing that really obviously covers what Snowden allegedly did,” Kent said.
Other crimes listed in the treaty — including larceny, obtaining property by false pretenses, and fraud — could conceivably be used by officials to extradite someone accused of espionage, he said.
Yet while Ecuador is seemingly turning into a haven for digital desperadoes, the country has a mixed track record on press freedoms.
The Ecuadorean legislature earlier this month passed a restrictive media law, establishing government-run media overseers and imposing sanctions on citizens who tarnish “people’s good name,” the Associated Press reported. The measure created several government commissions authorized to level civil and criminal penalties against journalists.
The legislation could run counter to statements made by Correa in June 2011 in an interview with Assange, just weeks before the president offered the WikiLeaks firebrand political asylum in Ecuador’s embassy, where he remains.
“We believe, my dear Julian, that the only things that should be protected against information sharing and freedom of speech are those set in the international treaties, in the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights: the dignity and the reputation of people, and the safety of people and the State,” Correa said during an appearance on Assange’s defunct television talk show.
“The rest, the more people find out about it, the better.”
- UPDATE: Ecuador offers NSA whistleblower and fugitive Edward Snowden asylum (babalublog.com)
- Snowden seeks asylum in Ecuador (boingboing.net)
- Snowden seeking asylum in Ecuador, says WikiLeaks (salon.com)
- US revokes Edward Snowden’s passport as Ecuador says they are considering his asylum request (therightscoop.com)
- Edward Snowden requests asylum in Ecuador (fireandreamitchell.com)
- Ecuador has received asylum request from NSA whistleblower Snowden – FM Patino (rt.com)
I’m not sure what to make of Anonymous. I do know that they have piqued my curiosity…
Love it or hate it, Wikileaks has become entrenched in popular culture. By releasing what are otherwise secret documents, Wikileaks has changed the world. But the repeated attacks on the group has exposed weaknesses of its centralized operation and have driven a wedge between it and previously allied groups, such as the hactivist collective Anonymous. And with Wikileaks founder and spokesman Julian Assange a wanted man, the days of Wikileaks have always been numbered.
But, as with the attacks on Napster, the attacks on Wikileaks did not crush the customers of the service. Instead, it restructures the operation, changing from a centralized agency to a de-centralized. Napster became replaced by bittorrent, and now Anonymous has announced its replacement for Wikileaks, a service they call TYLER.
The issues between Wikileaks and Anonymous go back to the financial problems forced upon Wikileaks after its finances were cut off. In order to continue functioning, Wikileaks had to begin to demand payment. This in turn added liabilities to Wikileaks and its supporters. Facing the added pressure, and the proven liability of the single target to focus efforts against the access of information, Anonymous took the same approach as taken several times before: decentralize. So began Anonymous’s “Project Mayhem” which has produced TYLER:
Now instead of a single target, every single machine connected to Tyler will become a hub. Millions of machines, all churning over and handling the data. It is a nightmare scenario for any group or agency seeking to hide its secrets. No longer will there be a large rat to target, but millions of scurrying cockroaches, any single survivor enabling the reconstruction of the entire network.
The actions against Wikileaks have, instead of prevented the leaking of sensitive data, now made the leaking of that data now a trivial occurence, done by anyone in a matter of minutes, all in complete anonymity. The concerns over another Bradley Manning, being held for releasing secret documentation, are almost trivial, since it will be next to impossible to track when the next Private Manning comes along. It has now become no longer a matter of if, but when.
The Anonymous TYLER system, the culmination of years of work for the hactivist collective, stands poised to change the rules of not only the internet, but of society itself. The age of state secrets, of corporate lies, can not continue with the bright light of TYLER to shine on them. This is a disruptive technology, you cannot fight it, only adapt to it.
- WikiLeaks gets Anonymous ire (thedroidguy.com)
- Anonymous Announces Wikileaks Alternative (VIDEO) (addictinginfo.org)
- Anonymous has falling out with WikiLeaks, calling it ‘filthy and rotten’ (computerworld.co.nz)
- Prosecution of Anonymous activists highlights war for Internet control | Glenn Greenwald (guardian.co.uk)
- Guardian person of the year: Voters choose Bradley Manning (guardian.co.uk)
- Worst security snafus of 2012 (computerworld.co.nz)
- Bradley Manning vs. Malala Yousafzai – And the System Wins (makersidiom.wordpress.com)
- Julian Assange, Wikileaks and Information as a Weapon (pandodaily.com)
I will not post the horrifying picture that accompanies the story on either McClatchey or The Raw Story. One would have to click on the link to either site to witness the horrific graphic detail.
In every war this country has ever fought, there are a few soldiers, who for whatever reason, have sunken into the darkest depths of the so-called fog of war.
According to a diplomatic cable published by WikiLeaks, U.S. troops massacred an Iraqi family in the town of Ishaqi in 2006, handcuffing and then shooting 11 people in the head including a woman in her 70’s and five children ages five and under.
McClatchy is reporting that the soldiers then called in an air strike on the house to cover up evidence of the killings.
This account differs sharply from an official version of the 2006 incident, which indicated that coalition forces captured an al Qaeda in Iraq operative in the house, which was destroyed in a firefight. The WikiLeaks cable, however, corroborates accounts by Ishaqi townspeople and includes questions about the incident by Philip Alston, the U.N.’s special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions.
The cable is dated twelve days after the incident, which took place March 15, 2006. In it, Alston says that autopsies performed in Tikrit on bodies pulled from the wreckage of the farmhouse indicated that all of the dead had been handcuffed and shot in the head.
The victims included “at least 10 persons, namely Mr. Faiz Hratt Khalaf, (aged 28), his wife Sumay’ya Abdul Razzaq Khuther (aged 24), their three children Hawra’a (aged 5) Aisha (aged 3) and Husam (5 months old), Faiz’s mother Ms. Turkiya Majeed Ali (aged 74), Faiz’s sister (name unknown), Faiz’s nieces Asma’a Yousif Ma’arouf (aged 5 years old), and Usama Yousif Ma’arouf (aged 3 years), and a visiting relative Ms. Iqtisad Hameed Mehdi (aged 23) were killed during the raid.”
Here is the cable…
- Exposed: Uncensored WikiLeaks cables posted to Web (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- WikiLeaks reveals murder of Iraqi children by US troops (rt.com)
- WikiLeaks Reveals U.S. Soliders Allegedly Killed Iraqi Children (huffingtonpost.com)
- WikiLeaks Says Unredacted Cables Exposed (abcnews.go.com)
- Exposed: Uncensored WikiLeaks cables posted to Web (seattlepi.com)
- Massive tome of uncensored WikiLeaks cables posted to Web (theglobeandmail.com)
- Uncensored WikiLeaks cables posted online (independent.co.uk)
…and probably bound to be quite effective…
“An attempt on you could bring the republic down.” – Fox News’s Glenn Beck, encouraging Sarah Palin in a letter to “look into protection for your family.”
“Keep your mouth shut.” – Commentator Bernie Goldberg, knocking Pima County, Ariz., Sheriff Clarence Dupnik for his remarks in the wake of the Tucson shootings.
“I wouldn’t have done it.” – Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, on Sarah Palin’s “crosshairs” map.
“This Jared guy’s chalkboard in his basement, I’m not sure it wouldn’t look that different than Glenn Beck’s chalkboard.” – HBO’s Bill Maher, discussing the Tucson shooter.
“Oh, you guys are nothing if not entertaining over there. It’s like living next door to The Simpsons, you know, the dysfunctional family down the block. Watching you guys, I mean I shouldn’t make too light of it, I think this is really a bad situation.” – Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, comparing neighboring Illinois to “The Simpsons.”
“Tone it down.” – Fox News Channel President Roger Ailes, requesting that his on-air employees take down the rhetoric a notch in the wake of the Tucson shooting.
“Whack-job nut maggot.” – Mike Huckabee, describing accused Tucson shooter Jared Loughner.
“I can’t be remorseful for something I think I didn’t do.” – Former Rep. Tom DeLay, defending himself despite being sentenced to three years in prison.
“Oh, so he’s into love-making. He’ll make great love to you then tell you what’s wrong with you. That’s called ‘seducing and reducing.'” – “Millionaire Matchmaker” Patti Stanger, offering analysis after some of Julian Assange’s earlier online profiles were read to her (she didn’t know it was Assange at the time).
“Still taking bites of the bacon, chewing and talking, VPOTUS chatted up the Delaware troops, wiping his mouth with the back of his hand.” – A pool report, describing a scene from Vice President Joe Biden’s trip to Afghanistan.
Sarah Palin sought to build her foreign policy credentials on Tuesday, with a new op-ed arguing that the Obama administration needs to “toughen up” on Iran based on information from leaked diplomatic cables that she had earlier denounced.
The former Alaska Governor writes in USA Today:
Iran continues to defy the international community in its drive to acquire nuclear weapons. Arab leaders in the region rightly fear a nuclear-armed Iran. We suspected this before, but now we know for sure because of leaked diplomatic cables. King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia “frequently exhorted the U.S. to attack Iran to put an end to its nuclear weapons program,” according to these communications. Officials from Jordan said the Iranian nuclear program should be stopped by any means necessary. Officials from the United Arab Emirates and Egypt saw Iran as evil, an “existential threat” and a sponsor of terrorism. If Iran isn’t stopped from obtaining nuclear weapons, it could trigger a regional nuclear arms race in which these countries would seek their own nuclear weapons to protect themselves.
The “leaked diplomatic cables” that Palin speaks of are, of course, dispatches released as part of WikiLeaks’ latest document dump, an action that she deemed “treasonous,” later asking why the group’s founder, Julian Assange, was not “pursued with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders.”
The general thrust of Palin’s op-ed is that the potential danger of Iran — nuclear or non-nuclear — is enough to warrant an escalation of the existing United Nations economic sanctions:
Much more can be done, such as banning insurance for shipments to Iran, banning all military sales to Iran, ending all trade credits, banning all financial dealings with Iranian banks, limiting Iran’s access to international capital markets and banking services, closing air space and waters to Iran’s national air and shipping lines, and, especially, ending Iran’s ability to import refined petroleum.
Palin made another foray into foreign policy over the summer when she blasted out her manifesto via Facebook. In that release, she argued for a sacrosanct defense budget, a reaffirmation of unconditional ties with Israel, and the elimination of a timetable for the drawdown of troops.
- The Serious Side Of Sarah Palin Wants Obama To “Get Tough With Iran” (mediaite.com)
- Sarah Palin On Iran: Speak Loudly And That’s About It (outsidethebeltway.com)
- Palin: Send Iranian mullahcracy to dustbin of history (hotair.com)
- WikiLeaks Contradicts Obama Administration on Iran (huffingtonpost.com)
- Jordanian websites to translate WikiLeaks (cbc.ca)
- WikiLeaks Makes Iran Attack Less Likely (tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com)
- “What the WikiLeaks Docs Reveal About Iran’s Nuclear Program” and related posts (thefastertimes.com)
WikiLeaks founder calls Bradley Manning ‘political prisoner’; says Fox hosts, politicians committing ‘terrorism’
Julian Assange has accused Fox personalities Mike Huckabee and Sarah Palin, among others, of committing terrorism through their calls to hunt down and kill the WikiLeaks founder.
In an interview with MSNBC’s Cenk Uygur, Assange referred to the politicians-turned-Fox-personalities as “shock jocks” who should be charged for inciting violence against him and his organization.
He also referred to Huckabee as “just another idiot trying to make a name for himself.”
Asked what he thought of the accusation — made by Vice President Joe Biden and others — that he is a “high-tech terrorist,” Assange said his organization’s actions didn’t meet the definition of terrorism — but those of Fox personalities and other TV pundits did.
“We see constant threats from people, the Republican Senate trying to make a name for themselves, people like Sarah Palin to shock jocks on Fox and, unfortunately, some members also of the Democratic Party, calling for my assassination, calling for the illegal kidnapping of my staff,” Assange said.
“What sort of message does that send about the rule of law in the United States? That is conducing violence in order to achieve a political end. The elimination of this organization or the threat of violence to achieve a political end, the elimination of a publisher. And that is the definition of terrorism.” More…
- Julian Assange Attacks Sarah Palin, Fox News, And Mike Huckabee On MSNBC (mediaite.com)
- Assange: US pushing “Digital McCarthyism” in assault on Wikileaks (boingboing.net)
- Assange rips ‘shock jock’ politicians (cnn.com)
- My Exclusive Interview with WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange (mydd.com)
- Mike Huckabee: WikiLeaks Source Should Be Executed (VIDEO) (huffingtonpost.com)
- US embassy cables culprit should be executed, says Mike Huckabee (guardian.co.uk)
Now this should be interesting, and less intimidating to the U.S. Government…uh, on second thought…
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said Tuesday the Swedish women who have accused him of sexual assault had got into a “tizzy” about the possibility they had caught a sexually transmitted disease from him.
Assange told the BBC that one account of what happened in August — the month at the centre of allegations against him — was that the two women had panicked when they found out they had both slept with him and went to police who “bamboozled” them.
He insisted he was fighting a Swedish extradition warrant because he believes “no natural justice” would occur in Sweden.
“There are some serious problems with the Swedish prosecution,” he said in an interview from the mansion of a wealthy supporter in eastern England where he must stay as part of his bail conditions.
Sweden wants Britain to extradite the 39-year-old Australian to face questioning over allegations from two women that he raped one of them and sexually assaulted the other in Stockholm in August.
Assange claimed that the Swedish authorities had asked that his Swedish lawyer be “gagged”, adding that his offers to be interviewed by video link or by Swedish officials in Britain had been rejected.
“I don’t need to be at the beck and call of people making allegations,” he said. More…
- Assange ‘natural justice’ concern (bbc.co.uk)
- Julian Assange: No “Natural Justice” in Sweden (cbsnews.com)
- WikiLeaks: Julian Assange claims women who made accusations of sexual assault ‘got into a tizzy’ (telegraph.co.uk)
- Assange case ‘flawed’ (theage.com.au)
- Assange defiant over extradition (bbc.co.uk)
- Assange: “I’ve Never Had A Problem Before With Women” [Leaky] (jezebel.com)
- Do accusations of conspiracy against Julian Assange stand up? Part 1 (liberalconspiracy.org)