Tag Archives: Condoleezza Rice

Susan Rice: A Victim of GOP Hypocrisy?

I reject the notion that the three Senators who questioned UN Ambassador Susan Rice’s professional competence as the next Secretary of State was racially motivated.

I do believe it was unabashedly partisan in nature.  It seemed to be a new angle toward side-lining the President’s political agenda for the next four years.

Mother Jones

[...]

The outrage expressed by Republican lawmakers—spurred by the ambassador reciting intelligence-community-generated talking points that turned out to be partially inaccurate—is very different from their response to another administration official named Rice who was accused of misleading the American public on a matter of national security.

That, of course, is Condoleezza Rice. When George W. Bush nominated Condoleezza Rice as secretary of state, some of the same Senate Republicans who are currently attacking Susan Rice supported Condi wholeheartedly, despite her role in helping to make the case for war in Iraq based on bogus intelligence. Back then, Republicans were much more willing to chalk up Condoleezza Rice’s parroting of flawed intel to well-intentioned mistakes as opposed to outright deception, even when the evidence said otherwise. Here’s how some of Susan Rice’s most vocal critics responded to the Bush administration’s disastrous handling of pre-war Iraq intelligence and the nomination of Condoleezza Rice.

Comments Off

Filed under GOP Malfeasance, UN Abassador Susan Rice

Rice vs. Rice: What changed for John McCain since 2004?

Rice vs. Rice: What changed for John McCain since 2004?

Remember Condoleeza Rice’s  ’smoking gun’ turning into a “mushroom cloud” statements on all the Sunday talk shows to justify the Bush Administration declaring war in Iraq?

Remember Condoleeza Rice’s answer to a question at the 9/11 Commission hearings:   “I believe it said, “Bin Laden determined to strike inside the United States”.

Just sayin’…she gave very bad intel and all one heard was crickets when it came to the GOP criticizing Rice’s remarks.  What’s so different in the Susan Rice instance?

Salon

The Republican senators attacking Susan Rice today never batted an eyelash when Condi Rice advanced bad intel

The president has just been reelected and looks to replace his secretary of state with a Ms. Rice who has already served in a senior administration position. The minority party in the Senate is threatening to obstruct her confirmation because she propagated faulty intelligence. The administration defends her, saying she merely recited the most credible intelligence of the moment and had no intention of misleading anyone, but the senators’ questions persist.

No, that’s not today! That was eight years ago when George W. Bush appointed his national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, to be the nation’s top diplomat a week after winning reelection.

Today, for the second straight day, President Obama’s U.N. ambassador, Susan Rice, whom he may nominate to be secretary of state, met with recalcitrant Republican senators on Capitol Hill to try to assuage them. And today, for the second straight day, the Republican senators immediately found reporters and informed the world that they were not satisfied. Today it was Republican Sens. Susan Collins and Bob Corker. Yesterday it was Sens. Kelly Ayotte and Lindsey Graham, along with the ringleader of the opposition, Sen. John McCain. The senators say that Rice misled the American people when she went on Sunday morning political talk shows after the Sept. 11 Benghazi attack and, citing talking points provided to her by the intelligence community that later proved to be false, said the attack grew out of a protest against an anti-Islam film.

Eight years ago, when Bush appointed Condoleezza Rice in 2004, Democrats said that she misled the American people when she propagated intelligence that later proved to be false. In her case, it was about Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction. She also sent a letter to Senate Democrats in March 2003 claiming that the U.S. had briefed U.N. weapons inspectors on what they knew about Iraq’s WMD program (they had not). And Democrats also charged that she concealed the CIA’s doubts about whether Iraq had sought uranium from Niger — she said there was “consensus” within the administration when in fact there was not; the story turned out to be false.

So what did the Republican senators questioning Susan Rice today say about the Condoleezza Rice committing the very same alleged crime then? A Nexis search turns up nothing from Collins or Graham of relevance. (Ayotte and Corker were not yet in the Senate.) McCain actually defended her. All three then-senators voted for her confirmation.

Whereas McCain is today giving the intelligence community the benefit of the doubt and placing the blame on Susan Rice, in 2004 his finger was pointed squarely at the intelligence community. “The president of the United States was told by the director of intelligence that the weapons of mass destruction information was a ‘slam dunk … So it was great failures, and we all know that the CIA has to be reformed,” McCain said on “Meet the Press” in November 2004 while discussing Rice’s nomination. A few days later he told Lou Dobbs on CNN: “I serve on the Commission on Weapons of Mass Destruction, and there is no doubt that the CIA is dysfunctional and there needs to be significant and fundamental changes made.”

During Rice’s confirmation hearings, where Democrats grilled her on the faulty intelligence, Rice echoed McCain. “Obviously, there were problems with the intelligence concerning Iraq (and) weapons of mass destruction,” Rice said.

But she should not be held responsible for their mistake, she explained. Asked why she told everyone in the lead-up to the war that Saddam Hussein was reconstituting his nuclear weapons program, Rice replied: “The majority of agencies in the intelligence community did. I was representing, Senator — and I’ve made this available for the record — the views of that majority.” She even expressed outrage at the CIA’s failure: “We cannot have a situation where the director of the CIA, when asked about Iraq, weapons of mass destruction, tells the president of the United States that it’s a quote, ‘slam dunk,’ when nothing could have been further from the truth.”

Continue Reading Here…

Comments Off

Filed under UN Abassador Susan Rice

Monday Blog Roundup 11-26-2012

 

Give the Texas Secessionists a Boat!
Buh-bye Talk of secession is heating up again in Texas. I know, I know, many of you ..

The Slow March to Gridlock
The New York Times has a great piece on the U.S. Senate’s slide into gridlock, includ..

McCain Backs Off Susan Rice Smear Campaign
Shortly after news broke about a fatal attack on the American consulate in Benghazi,..

Susan Rice, Condi Rice and Republican hypocrisy
U.N. Ambassador (and latest target of Republican vitriol) Susan Rice President Obama..

After Sandy: The Perils of Coastline Construction
After Sandy: The Perils of Coastline Construction

GOP Starting to Rebel Against No-Tax-Hikes Pledge
With the fiscal cliff looming for the United States, some Republican members of Congr..

John McCain: Abortion Issue Should Be Left Alone By Republicans
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) on Sunday urged members of his party to leave abortion di..

What We Learn From Mitt Romney’s Post-Mortem
What We Learn From Mitt Romney’s Post-Mortem

NY Times Warns On Climate Change: ‘Fear Death By Water’, Rising Seas L..
The NY Times (finally) goes apocalyptic on climate change. Here’s the cover image of..

Video: Sputtering McCain approaches farce with Rice attacks
Rachel Maddow exposes the baselessness of the ridiculous hectoring by Senator John M..

1 Comment

Filed under U.S. Politics

Soledad O’Brien destroys GOP over Benghazi, Susan Rice (video)

Rep. Joe Heck (R-Nevada) is apparently not on the same page as Senators John McCain and Lindsay Graham on this issue…although his original statement was meant to be the standard talking point the two senators want to send out to the press, Rep. Heck unitentionally muddies the waters a bit…

America BlogJohn Aravosis

I am seriously loving CNN’s Soledad O’Brien of late. Have always enjoyed her work, but lately the woman has been on fire when it comes to dealing with political types who are clearly playing games with the truth.  (As part of my homage to Soledad, see this post detailing her feat of “Sol-splaining” the truth to political hacks.)

Today it was GOP Rep. Joe Heck of Nevada, who was on Soledad’s show to talk about John McCain and Lindsay Graham trying to kill UN Ambassador Susan Rice’s expected nomination to be Secretary of State. McCain and Graham are upset with Rice because they thinks he lied, or didn’t know enough, about the situation in Libya immediately following the attack on our consulate and CIA outpost there.

soledad-obrien-1

Soledad is not impressed.

During their talk, Soledad pointed out – as I do in my post this morning – that McCain and Graham seem to be taking a hypocritical stance on Susan Rice’s nomination since they didn’t seem to have any problem with Condi Rice’s nomination to the same job, even though she did something far worse than Susan Rice. Condi aided the Bush administration in lying its way in to a war, Iraq, that has cost us trillions of dollars and countless American, and Iraqi, lives. That’s a lot bigger than 4 casualties at a US consulate in Libya.

In response, GOP Rep. Heck , who’s on the House Intelligence Committee, which is investigating the administration over the Libya attack, appears to exonerate Susan Rice, and instead prove that Condi Rice should have been the one blocked from becoming Secretary of State. The video is below, but here’s NYT columnist Charles Blow’s take on what Heck just said:

CHARLES BLOW: What I’m trying to figure out, are you saying that Condoleeza Rice actually should have known, because she had more intimacy with the information [WMD in Iraq] and then still said something that she knew was wrong, and that in fact Susan Rice is a sacrificial lamb because she was put out as the face of the administration for something that she didn’t know anything [about], so in fact that’s more of a defense of Susan Rice than it is a condemnation of Susan Rice. That’s how it sounds to me.

SOLEDAD O’BRIEN: That’s what it sounds like to me, so, forgive me sir, will you walk us through this one more time. You think it’s different because Condoleeza Rice actually had first-hand knowledge?

And Heck just continues reiterating that Susan Rice’s situation is far worse than Condis’ because Condi was heavily involved in Iraq war planning and Susan Rice was not heavily involved in what happened in Benghazi. Which only goes to prove that Susan Rice shouldn’t be the Republican party’s scapegoat.

Then again, far be it for the Republicans to turn down the chance to beat up on a woman, and a black woman at that. Rice should consider herself fortunate that she wasn’t a Latina too.

Here’s the video – great television, and a great job by Soledad and Charles Blow.

2 Comments

Filed under GOP Hypocrisy, Soledad O’Brien, UN Abassador Susan Rice

Mitt Romney’s base instincts

Mitt Romney's base instincts

Mitt Romney’s base instincts

What can I say about  Mitt Romney except, “…sloppy campaign, Mr. Fix it.”

Salon – Joan Walsh

His advisors admit he’s not after swing voters any more, he’s hyping fear and culture war to turn out the far right

All eyes are on Politico’s expose of Romney campaign infighting – mainly a lot of anonymous handwringers complaining about Stuart Stevens – but this piece in BuzzFeed deserves more attention: In “Romney’s New Strategy Turns Right,” campaign advisors tell McKay Coppins, “This is going to be a base election, and we need them to come out to vote.”

It’s going to be a base election for Romney, all right – “base” as in low and crass, and “base” as in designed to turn out the base.

That’s been obvious to me for a while – I said so last week on PoliticsNation – but it ought to get more attention now that the Romney folks are tipping their hand. Again. Weeks ago, of course,  anonymous members of Team Romney told the New York Times  they were “convinced [Romney] needs a more combative footing against President Obama in order to appeal to white, working-class voters,” and so he “has added a harder edge … injecting volatile cultural themes into the race.” Romney’s dishonest welfare ads, insisting that President Obama “gutted” the work requirement, was just one example of the campaign’s ugly new racial appeal, the Times showed.

At the same time, the GOP convention in Tampa at least tried to showcase a more diverse party, with Gov. Susana Marinez, Sen. Marco Rubio and Condoleezza Rice among the most prominent speakers. After Clint Eastwood’s cranky old man act mocked Obama, Romney himself took a more respectful approach in his speech, even attempting an appeal to disappointed Obama voters.

The BuzzFeed article shows that the campaign abandoned that approach almost immediately, maybe after seeing Romney got absolutely no convention bounce. Since then, Romney abandoned his standard stump speech, which focused on the economy, for a harder-edged pitch larded with references to God and patriotism and sharp attacks on Obama:

In heavily-Evangelical Sioux County, Iowa, Romney’s introductory speakers — including conservative Rep. Steve King — sermonized at length about keeping Christian values, and vouched for his love of Jesus Christ. In Virginia Beach, he spoke to a flag-waving crowd of veterans and military families — appearing alongside televangelist Pat Robertson — and built his remarks around patriotism, defense spending, and keeping God on the national currency.

Romney’s shrill foreign policy stands over the last week accomplish similar political goals: riling up anti-Obama Islamophobes, many of whom believe that the president himself is a Muslim.

CONTINUE READING

Comments Off

Filed under Mitt Romney Campaign

White Nationalist CPAC Panelist’s Website Attacks Condoleezza Rice

Condoleezza Rice - Caricature

Condoleezza Rice – Caricature (Photo credit: DonkeyHotey)

Why are those clowns panicking?  She was never seriously considered.  I believe that Drudge planted the article to take attention off of Mitt’s problems about Bain Capital and SEC forms.

BuzzFeed

Vdare, the website run by white nationalist and CPAC panelist Peter Brimelow, today editorialized against the possibility of Condoleezza Rice becoming Mitt Romney’s running mate.

Someone writing under the name “Patrick Cleburne” (Cleburne was a Confederate general) calls Rice an “an Affirmative Action cipher with no visible talent except for obeying Neocons” and says her nomination would indicate that “a Romney Presidency is likely to degenerate into minority appeasement.”

A similarly-themed “Say No to Rice!!!” email forward sent to BuzzFeed includes a link to the Vdare item. It is a pledge which attacks Rice on her foreign policy, experience, and looks, suggests Arizona Governor Jan Brewer as a superior female vice presidential candidate:

Say No to Rice!!!

I hereby vow not to vote for Mitt Romney if he chooses the liberal Condoleezza Rice as his running mate.

We thought the open-borders Rubio was bad. Rice is even worse. Check out some of her positions:

On most social issues, Rice is a liberal.

Like Rubio, Rice supports the Third World invasion of the US. Both legal and illegal immigration are driving down American wages, but Rice doesn’t seem to care. Like Cultural Marxists engaged in social engineering, Rice wants to destroy the historic American nation.

Rice is tied to the disastrous foreign policy of the Bush years. Romney should be trying to distance himself from the disastrous Bush years, not embracing them.

Rice is inexperienced, uninspiring and uncharismatic. (In fact, she’s quite unattractive.)

Rice has never held elected office. The selection of her as a running mate would be blatant affirmative action — much like Obama getting the early blessing of the Democratic Party was blatant affirmative action. Aren’t Republicans supposed to be against affirmative action?

If it’s a female that Romney seeks as his running mate, there are much better choices, such as Jan Brewer, who would inspire and energize conservatives.

If Romney is so naive to select someone like Rice as his running mate, he doesn’t deserve conservatives’ votes.

Please take the conservative pledge with me and promise not to vote for Romney — either don’t vote for vote third party — if Romney chooses Rice as his running mate.

Thank you.

Please forward this to everyone you know.

Liz in Ohio

Comments Off

Filed under Mitt Romney

Condoleezza Rice Says America Will Never Be Race Blind

The premise is no surprise, but the statement coming from Republican, Condoleezza Rice is…

The Root

Citing a black president, two black secretaries of state and progress for African Americans beyond what her grandparents ever thought would be possible, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said on a Thanksgiving edition of Face the Nation that America may have come a long way in confronting racial inequality, but it will never be “race blind,” and that race and poverty in America are “still a terrible witch’s brew.” That’s not exactly breaking news, but are you surprised to hear the hard truth from her?

From CBS News:

Still, she argued that even though America has “gotten to a place [where] race is not the limiting factor that it once was,” she said that “we’re never going to erase race as a factor in American life.”

“It is a birth defect with which this country was born out of slavery; we’re never really going to be race blind,” she said.

She pointed to the confluence of race and poverty as a particularly troubling constraint for overcoming inequality, and wondered if that problem isn’t becoming even more exacerbated in recent years.

See video here…

Related articles

Comments Off

Filed under Racism

Politico’s: The Week In One-Liners

Politico

The week’s top quotes in politics …

“Have you ever been accused of sexual harassment?” — Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain repeating a POLITICO reporter’s question.

“No. I was just giving a speech.” — GOP White House hopeful Rick Perrydenying that he was on pain meds while speaking in New Hampshire last week.

“Mitt Romney is the luckiest motherfudger on Earth.” — Comedian Jon Stewart’s commentary on the state of the 2012 race.

“I’ve been as consistent as human beings can be.” — GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney defending his political record.

“I’m the wrong gender.” — Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright on why Herman Cain hasn’t called to ask her for a meeting.

“It’s not often I’m asked about some random person in America.” — House Speaker John Boehner responding to a question about Grover Norquist.

“Quite extraordinary, weird and a bit creepy.” — Former Secretary of StateCondoleezza Rice telling CNN’s Piers Morgan about Muammar Qadhafi’s crush on her.

“Well, I believe the phrase from the Bible is, ‘The Lord helps those who help themselves.’” — White House press secretary Jay Carney referring to a saying that actually is not in the Bible.

Comments Off

Filed under Politico's Top Political Quotes

Luntz: “9/11 allows us to celebrate Bush/Cheney for keeping us safe”

Dr. Frank Luntz at the 2009 Texas Book Festiva...

Image via Wikipedia

What in the world is wrong with right-wingers.  Are they that brain-washed about 9/11 and the Bush/Cheney misguided involvement  in the events following that tragedy?

Frank Luntz is the guru behind most right-wing talking points.  One would think that he would know better, unless of course, this is simply yet another “messaging” ploy to re-write the negative history of the Bush administration’s abject failures leading up to the events of 9/11 and mistakes and mis-steps after 9/11.

Raw Replay

In the mind of pollster Frank Luntz, September 11th gives the nation a chance to praise George W. Bush and Dick Cheney.

Appearing on Your World with Neil Cavuto on Friday afternoon, Luntz expressed his concern about America’s lack of optimism in the last decade. Then, the Fox analysis shared a controversial sentiment by speaking in positive terms about the the previous Administration despite the attack happening on their watch.

“I don’t think this date is a positive,” Luntz said. “Yes, it allows us to look back and say ‘We haven’t been hit.’ Yes, it allows us to appreciate George Bush and Dick Cheney for keeping us safe. But in the end, it reminds us that we are vulnerable, and that hurts our confidence.”

WATCH: Video from Fox News, which appeared on September 9, 2011.

Related articles

2 Comments

Filed under U.S. Politics

Valerie Plame & Joe Wilson Respond To Dick Cheney

The Last Word

In a Last Word exclusive, former CIA officer Valerie Plame and her husband, former U.S. ambassador Joe Wilson join the show to discuss Cheney’s controversial new book, which addresses the now infamous CIA leak case.

Part 1

Part 2

3 Comments

Filed under Joe Wilson, Valerie Plame