Tag Archives: Chris Wallace

Congressman Tears Into Fox News Host For Obsessing Over Benghazi Talking Points

As Daily Kos reminded us…If it’s Sunday, It’s Benghazi All Day Long…

Think Progress

Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA) tore into Fox News’ Chris Wallace and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers (R-MI) for obsessing over the talking points U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice used when talking to the media in the days following the attack in Benghazi, Libya rather than focusing on identifying the perpetrators of the killings. “I think the desire of the Republicans to create a scandal here has really undermined any ability to have a credible look at what actually happened,” Smith said during an appearance on Fox News Sunday alongside Rogers.

While acknowledging that the administration’s initial assessment of Bengazi did not reflect what officials later learned about the incident, Smith criticized Fox for suggesting that that Rice’s remarks on five Sunday news shows presented a definitive picture of the events of Sep. 11, 2012.

“[The administration] didn’t reach conclusions the way you just presented that was that by the Sunday afterwards that the administration said here is what happened, here is our conclusion,” Smith explained. “But the president never said, no terrorism, no Al Qaeda. There was a dispute about how soon to lead to specific conclusions that now is being made into Watergate and Iran-Contra.” Watch it:

Indeed, during multiple appearances on the Sunday shows Rice said that the attacks were in part a response to the anti-Islam video that had spurred protests across the region, but did not offer a definitive answer as to what exactly took place in Benghazi and predicated the administration’s assessment as “based on the information that we have at present.” The CIA and State Department did initially believe that the attack was spontaneously inspired by the protests in Cairo, Egypt.

Still, in the days after the attack, both Obama and then Secretary of State Hillary Clintondescribed the events in Benghazi as an “act of terror” and pledged justice against the perpetrators.

Wallace responded to Smith pointing out that intelligence officials changed Rice’s talking points at least 12 times, taking out references to prior attacks and specific terrorist groups. “We’re talking about talking points,” Smith reminded the host. “There was no question this was a it terrorist attack. They didn’t deny it. I would much rather get into investigation of the groups that threatened the U.S., figure out how they are, and how to stop them instead of debating how one memo was put together in the immediate days after the attack.”

1 Comment

Filed under Benghazi, Sunday Talks Shows

Utah Congressman Claims Benghazi Witnesses Are Being Threatened But Can’t Cite Any Examples

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT)

The TP article below demonstrates how this has become the latest GOP playbook:  Accuse the POTUS of everything under the sun (and hope that something sticks) but proof or facts are not an option…

Think Progress

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) accused the Department of State of repeated threats and intimidation against witnesses to last year’s attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya. But when pressed by Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace for examples, he could offer none.

Asked about a claim by a witness’s lawyer that whistle-blowers had been blocked from testifying (a claim rejected by the Department of State), Chaffetz said that “more than one” witness has indeed been “suppressed” by the Obama administration.

WALLACE: Tell me–a direct threat, a direct act of intimidation against a potential witness?

CHAFFETZ: Yes, and I think we’ll probably…

WALLACE: Tell me one… tell what’s been said.

CHAFFETZ: There are people, more than one, that have felt intimidation from the State Department.

Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-MA) quickly debunked his colleague: “There’ve been two attorneys involved here, the only reason they haven’t received information is that they haven’t asked for it yet… there has not been a request for documents from these attorneys to the State Department.”

The only “retaliation,” Lynch noted, was that one of the witnesses wants a reassignment and a promotion and feels he’s being retaliated against because has not yet gotten the promotion.

Watch the video:

As Media Matters has previously noted, Victoria Toensing, the Republican attorney making the initial claims has been peddling Benghazi conspiracy theories for months, including a November Fox News op/ed in which she attempted to draw a link between the attack and the resignation of former CIA director David Petraeus.

1 Comment

Filed under GOP Dog Whistle Politics

Ryan Budget Assumes Obamacare Repeal; Chris Wallace: ‘That’s Not Going To Happen’

Liberaland

Paul Ryan’s budget is based on a false premise.

WALLACE: Are you saying that as part of your budget you would repeal — you assume the repeal of Obamacare?

RYAN: Yes.

WALLACE: Well that’s not going to happen.

Comments Off

Filed under Obamacare, Paul Ryan Lies

Mitt Romney’s first post-election interview: 5 takeaways

The Week

Romney started his return to the public spotlight on Fox News Sunday

On Sunday, Fox News aired the first interview with Mitt Romney since the former Massachusetts governor lost the 2012 presidential race. Fox New Sundayhost Chris Wallace flew out to California to interviewRomney and his wife, Ann, and they dissected what went wrong for the Romney campaign, what the Romneys plan to do now, and what ails the GOP, President Obama, and America, among other topics. (Watch the Mitt Romney solo interview below.) Here, five key takeaways from Romney’s first big post-election interview:

1. He and Ann thought he was going to win until the very end (think: Ohio)
Both Romneys believed they were moving to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. right up until the returns started coming in, they tell Wallace. “I think Mitt intellectually was thinking it was possible we couldn’t” win, Ann says. “He knew how close it was, but my heart and whole soul was, we’re going to win, I was there.” Mitt agrees that “we were convinced that we’d win,” even though the polls were close. “We knew the energy and passion was with our voters, and my heart said we were going to win.” The first hint that his internal polls were wrong was when Florida exit polls started coming in showing a very close race — “we thought we’d win solidly in Florida,” Romney says — and from there it was “a slow recognition” that he’d lost. “Ultimately, when the Ohio numbers began coming in and they were disappointing,” he began to give up hope.

2. The Romneys blame his loss on his campaign, plus ObamaCare
Mitt Romney mostly blames his own campaign for his loss, singling out his poor showing among blacks, Latinos, and other minorities. The campaign wasn’t “effective at taking my message primarily to minority voters,” he says, and “the ObamaCare attractiveness and feature was something we underestimated… particularly among lower incomes.” ObamaCare? “ObamaCare was very attractive, particularly to those without health insurance,” Romney says. “And they came out in large numbers to vote.”

At the same time, Romney acknowledges that his infamous “47 percent” remark “hurt and did real damage to my campaign,” even though suggesting that almost half the people in the country are moochers is “not what I meant.” Reinforcing a common criticism — or excuse, from supporters — that he’s a “famously unprincipled political weather-vane,” says Daniel Larison atThe American Conservative, Romney added: “What I said is not what I believe.”

Ann Romney, for her part, contributed this little “sound bite that’s sure to get all kinds of rotation over several news cycles this week,” says Eric Wemple at The Washington Post: “I’m happy to blame the media.” She says that the campaign didn’t let people “really get to know Mitt for who he was,” but “it was not just the campaign’s fault. I believe it was the media’s fault as well” for not giving him “a fair shake.” There’s “a mound of contradiction” in that critique, since the campaign tightly controlled media access to Mitt Romney, says Wemple. Blaming both the campaign and the media “at the same time is a touch precious.”

One thing Romney explicitly did not blame: New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R). “I’m not going to worry about how Chris was doing what he thought was best for the people of his state,” he says. “I lost my election because of my campaign, not because of what anyone else did.”

3. Mitt Romney thinks he would be doing a better job as president
Romney doesn’t have many nice things to say about the man who beat him. The president, mostly, is letting a “critical moment, this golden moment just slip away” to fix America’s long-term fiscal problems.

It kills me not to be there, not to be in the White House doing what needs to be done. The president is the leader of the nation. The president brings people together, does the deals, does the trades, knocks the heads together. The president leads. And — and I don’t see that kind of — of leadership happening right now. [Fox News]

Instead, Obama is “out campaigning to the American people, doing rallies around the country, flying around the country and berating Republicans and blaming and pointing,” which only makes GOP lawmakers “retrench and then put up a wall and to fight back.” Maybe Romney is right that he “would have been better at working out a deal, says Ann Althouse at her blog, “but Obama, being better at campaigning, won the election, and if what he is doing now is more campaigning… well, that’s the downside of democracy, isn’t it? We judge the campaigns. We don’t know what expertise they’d bring to negotiating and reconciling differences.”

Continue here…

 

Comments Off

Filed under U.S. Politics

Ann Romney On ‘Fox News Sunday’: ‘I’m Happy To Blame The Media’ For Mitt’s Loss (VIDEO)

The would-be First Lady speaks…again…

The Huffington Post

Former Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney and his wife Ann sat down with Fox News’ Chris Wallace for their first interview since the 2012 election. The couple candidly discussed the campaign they ran and the disappointment they felt when they lost the election.

When Wallace asked Ann why she thought her husband lost, she partially blamed the media. She also expressed her frustration that voters “didn’t really get to know Mitt for who he was.”

“I want to pick up on that,” Wallace said. “There were reports that you and your oldest son Tagg were frustrated with the Romney campaign that they didn’t ‘let Mitt be Mitt.’ That they didn’t let him show his more open, compassionate side. True?”

“Well, of course … but it was not just the campaign’s fault. I believe it was the media’s fault as well … He was not being given a fair shake, that people weren’t really allowed to see him for who he was,” she said.

“Okay, what about the media?” Wallace pressed.

“I’m happy to blame the media,” Ann said through laughs.

“Do you think the media was in the tank for Barack Obama?” Wallace asked.

“I think that any time you’re running for office, you always think that you’re being portrayed unfairly. Of course on our side, [we] believe there is more bias in favor of the other side,” Ann said. “I think that’s a pretty universally felt opinion.”

Video:

http://bcove.me/q4umapps

 

5 Comments

Filed under Fox News

Ann Romney has not gotten over losing the election

Some people have dubbed Ann Romney The Queen of Mean…just saying…

The Week

Fox News has bagged the first interview with the Romneys since President Obama’s convincing victory in November, and the conservative-leaning network has offered a sneak preview to whet the appetite of political junkies and Romney fans. In an interview with PoliticoFox News Sundayhost Chris Wallace says Mitt has taken his defeat in stride, but his wife Ann “feels the pain and the what-ifs and the hurt more than he does.” Wallace adds, “There’s a lot of emotion that comes through in the interview, and she’s more open about it — the ‘what might have been.’”

Mitt, on the other hand, reportedly went into the election knowing he’d face liberal bias in the media, but “you don’t expect anything different and that’s part of what you wage in a campaign,” says Wallace. Romney also reportedly believes he could handle “the mess in Washington” a “lot better” than the White House’s current occupant.

The full interview will air this weekend on Fox News Sunday.

Watch the clip…

 

5 Comments

Filed under U.S. Politics

NRA head LaPierre shocked that Fox News called him out

The NRA can’t hide behind the protective bubble of conservative TV and talk radio, without encountering some backlash from time to time, even from such an insular group…

America Blog

You know you have to be on the far fringe of right-wing extremism when you get called out by Fox News.

NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre didn’t know what hit him when Fox’s own Chris Wallace attacked him over the tasteless and much criticized NRA TV ad that targeted the Obama girls.

And of course, as we found out later, the NRA ad was a total lie.  There are no “armed guards” at the Obama girls’ schools (and the NRA wasn’t referring to Secret Service).

In LaPierre’s world, the only answer to gun control is a police state where everyone has their own police defense team everywhere. Every man an army.  Sounds dreamy, doesn’t it?  And the Teabaggers support this NRA police state because…why? Does their obsession with guns mean more to them than freedom itself? How bizarre.

Comments Off

Filed under NRA's Wayne LaPierre

Fox News Host Blows Up At NRA Head: ‘That’s Ridiculous And You Know It, Sir!’

At times Chris Wallace manifests a few of his late father, Mike Wallace’s traits.  Not often, but now and then…

Think Progress

Fox News host Chris Wallace tore into National Rifle Association’s contention that President Obama and other elites are hypocritical for employing security guards to protect their children, while downplaying the importance of armed protection in preventing gun violence.

During a heated exchange with NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre on Sunday, Wallace played a clip of a now infamous NRA ad criticizing Obama for relying on Secret Service to guard his children and asked if the organization believed that every child in America faces a threat similar to that of the Obama kids. LaPierre said that they do, leading Wallace to forcefully push back against the gun chief, saying, “that’s ridiculous and you know it, Sir!” Watch it:

Wallace went on to note that armed guards in school will not protect children “in the shopping mall, in the movie theater, on the street” and shamed the gun lobby for seeking to use class as a wedge in the gun debate. He noted that LaPierre himself relies on armed security guards and asked, “Does that make you an elite, and out-of-touch elite, because you have security?” “This idea of an elite class is just nonsense.”

Throughout his appearance, LaPierre maintained that universal background checks or limits on assault weapons would infringe on the rights of law abiding Americans and could never deter hardened criminals or gang members from obtaining fire arms. He insisted that only armed guards — the kind that Obama uses to protect his children — and increased prosecution of criminals could reduce gun violence.

3 Comments

Filed under NRA's Wayne LaPierre

FOX NEWS LIES: Obama only had a majority for 133 days, not two years

Fox News Lies

The Examiner

Fox News is in business because their model of success depends on their viewers not knowing the facts. Host of Fox News, Chris Wallace, made the incorrect assertion during an interview Sunday that President BarackObama had a filibuster proof majority (60 out of 100 votes) in the Senate for two years. The actual fact is Democrats only had a filibuster proof majority for 133 days, a far cry from the over 700 days that Wallace gleefully interjected.

This is not the first and will certainly not the last time Fox New has been caught saying completely untrue things on the air.

The statements took place during an interview with the mayor of Los AngelesAntonio Villaraigosa. Wallace asked Villaraigosa, “What’s stupid about Obama and the Democrats?” and the mayor declined to engage on the baiting point. The conversation then shifted to Villarigosa explaining that President Obama has found few willing GOP lawmakers to cross the aisle and then paraphrased Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell‘s now infamous war cry that the “number one issue is to block the president.”

Wallace shot back with the fallacy, “But in fairness, the first two years, he (President Obama) had a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate and a big majority in the House.”

There is certainly nothing fair about telling a lie on the air to millions of people. Villarigosa did not deflect the point as untrue, and that was his failing.

The simply reality is Democrats only had a filibuster-proof majority from September 24, 2009 to February 4, 2010, as was noted by talkingpointsmemo.com

This lie that is perpetuated by Fox News as fact, shows that if a lie is told enough times then it is accepted as truth.

The video can be viewed here, via crooksandliars.com.

Chris Wallace has yet to apologize or issue a retraction.

Comments Off

Filed under Fox News Lies

Scalia Suggests ‘Hand-Held Rocket Launchers’ Are Protected Under Second Amendment

It’s time for wacky Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia to step down.  There is a possibility that the onset of dementia may have taken over his already depraved mind.

This is yet one more important reason to vote wisely.  Whichever candidate you choose to vote for, know that he will probably pick at least two SCOTUS candidates in the next four years.  In my opinion, the ideology of the candidates will reflect whether the Court will remain staunchly conservative or tip the scales to a more progressive Court.

Elections matter and they DO have consequences.

Think Progress

This morning on Fox News Sunday, Justice Antonin Scalia reiterated just how extremely his Constitutional originalism can be applied. Referring to the recent shooting in Aurora, CO, host Chris Wallace asked the Supreme Court Justice about gun control, and whether the Second Amendment allows for any limitations to gun rights. Scalia admitted there could be, such as “frighting” (carrying a big ax just to scare people), but they would still have to be determined with an 18th-Century perspective in mind. According to his originalism, if a weapon can be hand-held, though, it probably still falls under the right o “bear arms”:

WALLACE: What about… a weapon that can fire a hundred shots in a minute?

SCALIA: We’ll see. Obviously the Amendment does not apply to arms that cannot be hand-carried — it’s to keep and “bear,” so it doesn’t apply to cannons — but I suppose here are hand-held rocket launchers that can bring down airplanes, that will have to be decided.

WALLACE: How do you decide that if you’re a textualist?

SCALIA: Very carefully.

Watch it…

Scalia’s across-the-board defense of weapon-carrying laws is not new, having been at the heart of his majority opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller, which protected an individual’s right to possess firearms. However, his nonchalant suggestion that private citizens could legally carry rocket launchers so long as they’re “hand-held” suggests just how willing he is to protect an armed nation.

Such originalism is a dangerous distortion of 21st-Century reality. There is no conceivable way to apply the Founding Fathers’ understanding of a  ”well-regulated militia” armed with slow-to-load, hard-to-aim muskets to today’s weapon technology. Arguably, the full extent of alleged gunman James Holmes’ munitions could have easily decimated an entire brigade of musketeers before they’d even loaded their first ball.

2 Comments

Filed under Justice Antonin Scalia, SCOTUS Nominees