Tag Archives: Barack Obama presidential campaign 2008

Obama, Tearful, Finishes Campaign In Iowa, Where It Started

This was President Obama’s last campaign speech ever

(Start at 12:00 point to see the president’s speech.)

The Huffington Post

As sentimentality goes, President Barack Obama hosting the last campaign event of his political career in Des Moines, Iowa, is hard to top. The  Hawkeye State launched the then-junior senator from Illinois to national prominence. And there is a movie script-like quality to having such a historic political trajectory emerge out of the frosty cornfields.

Speaking just steps from his 2008 caucus headquarters on Monday evening, it seemed at times as if the magic hadn’t faded.

“I came back to ask you to help us finish what we started because this is where our movement for change began,” Obama declared. “To all of you who’ve lived and breathed the hard work of change: I want to thank you. You took this campaign and made it your own … starting a movement that spread across the country.

“When the cynics said we couldn’t, you said yes we can. You said yes we can and we did. Against all odds, we did,” he said.

Wiping the occasional tear from his eye, and looking over a crowd of 20,000, Obama concluded with the same story that he told on the last day of his ’08 campaign: about the origins of his signature “fired-up-ready-to-go” chant. The arc of his first term in office was seemingly complete.

But if anything, the late night rally in Des Moines underscored how different Obama’s first and second White House runs have been. For all its poignant undertones, Monday night marked the end of a campaign that had little of the emotional appeal of four years ago. There was no sweeping “hope” narrative, no history-making proposition, no shadows of the Bush years to escape. Instead there was a business-like approach to a daunting task: how to re-elect a president with a slate of accomplishments, but with reduced popularity, a poor economy and no novelty.

“The biggest difference between 2008 and 2012 is that the sense of the mission changed,” said one Obama campaign adviser who, like nearly everyone, would discuss the campaign’s inner workings only on condition of anonymity. “In 2008, there was the sense of optimism and hope around the mission -– of changing the world. In 2012, the mission is as much the clear-eyed recognition of how important stopping the other side is. It is a grimmer, more realistic sense of mission.”

How Obama’s aides traversed this path is a story that will be told in greater detail in the election post-mortems. But months of conversations. And it shows a team that, while lacking the heartstrings of 2008, stayed true to other guiding principles: data-driven decision-making and solid execution.

“There has always been a laser-like focus on the part of the campaign on how to get where they need to be,” explained Hari Sevugan, who served as a spokesman for the 2008 campaign. “It was about delegates in 2008 and pathways to 270 [Electoral College votes] in 2012. “The formula, then and now, was always inspiration and energy at 30,000 feet and a no-nonsense attitude toward numbers and mechanics on the ground.”

Continued here…

1 Comment

Filed under Election Day

Conservative Tries To Donate To Obama As Bin Laden, Commits Crime

WND is just one of many right-wing online publications that seem to have spent a huge amount of time trying to shine the most negative and despicable light on President Obama through lies, innuendos and blatant slander….

Addicting Info

WND, one of my personal favorite right-wing propaganda machine sites, has apparently and unwittingly committed a crime while erroneously reporting that Obama is accepting money from foreign nationals.

WND made the claim that, “Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol and proxy server, a disposable credit card and a fake address, “Osama bin Laden” has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.”

First of all, that’s not true. As the Obama campaign has explained (and has, unsurprisingly, been ignored),

“If a billing address is verified via AVS, then the credit card contribution is processed without delay. Some transactions caught by AVS may initially appear to a donor to have been accepted even though this is not the case. Obama for America employs a manual process to review any transaction flagged by AVS, also taking into account other fraud risk factors, and using fraud detection services provided by our credit card processor.

“As an example, the contribution discussed here may have initially appeared to have gone through when the donor completed the transaction at 10:18 a.m. but it was rejected at 4:51 p.m. under our standard fraud detection procedures.

“So any claims that Obama for America has disabled AVS are inaccurate; any question about this would have been answered-if the question had been asked.”

Conveniently, this information is not noted in the WND article, but they don’t seem to care much about what is correct and what isn’t. They also state that, “The acceptance of foreign contributions is strictly illegal under U.S. campaign finance law,” which isn’t true, either. Foreign donations, provided they come from U.S. citizens, are perfectly legal. What isn’t legal are donations from foreign nationals. American citizens outside of the United States must prove citizenship for the donation to be accepted.

Another bit of easily verifiable information that they failed to properly investigate comes from the Daily Caller, a well known source for totally fair and balanced conservative propaganda news:

As the Daily Caller reported, a statement accompanied the GAI’s report from former U.S. Attorney Ken Sukhia noting that 68 percent of traffic to BarackObama.com comes from foreign users, all of whom are redirected to a fundraising page operated by the president’s re-election campaign.

First of all, the domain name that the Daily Caller reported on was not – repeat, not – BarackObama.com. It was, in fact, Obama.com, and those two domain names have different traffic results entirely. However, the 68% foreign traffic number is wrong for both, as easily seen and verified on Alexa (barackobama.com site stats found here and obama.com stats here).

Here are screenshots for the traffic percentages to each:

As you can see, foreign hits are actually only 17.6% of traffic on BarackObama.com — a far cry from 68%.

Here’s the picture for Obama.com:

For Obama.com, 29.3% are from foreign countries. Also, considering Obama’s good standing in the world, it is not surprising in the least that there are foreign visitors to his site.

On another note, somebody should probably let the good folks over at WND know that donations in another person’s name are not permitted before they take the following action: “WND is preparing an affidavit for the Federal Elections Commission and the FBI on the illegal donation accepted by the Obama campaign.”

Yeah, good luck with that. Aaron Klein, the writer that published this piece of easily disproved garbage, should probably get the “worst journalist ever” award for this one. However, the real goal was never accurate journalism anyway, but rather a piece of fiction that will be seized upon and repeated ad nauseam. As reported by Media Matters:

Right-wing media are ignoring anti-fraud protections the Obama campaign has in place to allege that the Obama campaign accepted donations from someone impersonating Osama bin Laden.

Matt Drudge is hyping an article by World Net Daily’s Aaron Klein who claimed that ”Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol and proxy server, a disposable credit card and a fake address, ‘Osama bin Laden’ has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.’ “

Have fun with that, conservatives. We’ll be looking forward to your breathless and credulous reporting on this non-story for the next week in between your hourly floggings of the made up Benghazi scandal.

Comments Off

Filed under Right-wing disinformation campaign, Right-wing Media

Morgan Freeman Ad For Obama Campaign Goes Viral [VIDEO]

I saw the video last week.  I can understand it going viral.  It’s not an attack ad.  It merely states truth and  a positive outcome.

International Business Times

Oscar-winning actor Morgan Freeman, who has already contributed more than $1 million to the Obama campaign via the Priorities USA Super PAC, finally lent his iconic voice to the Obama campaign in a new ad that first aired on Sunday’s NFL and MLB playoff games.

In roughly 24 hours since being posted online, Freeman’s video ad for President Obama has already racked up more than 187,000 views and 3,500 likes on YouTube, and is continuing to gain steam.

Here is Freeman’s full script from the 30-second video:

“Every president inherits challenges; few have faced so many. Four years later our enemies have been brought to justice. Our heroes are coming home. Assembly lines are humming again—there are still challenges to meet, children to educate, a middle class to rebuild, but the last thing we should do is turn back now.”

President Barack Obama approved this message, and apparently, so have thousands of others on YouTube.

What do you think of the ad? Check it out below, and give us your reaction in the comments section at the bottom of the page.

Comments Off

Filed under Morgan Freeman, Obama 2012, Obama Re-election Team

Swastika Found On Obama Campaign Office In Colorado

Between the gun shots, swastika graffiti and Romney’s total lack of deference to the POTUS in the last debate,  it appears that some far-right fringe nut jobs seem to think it’s open season on President Obama.

I still have to wonder about the mindset of people who have no respect for the Office of the Presidency or the man holding that office.

Shame on all those who wish to do harm to our country and our POTUS in the name of hatred.

The Huffington Post

A swastika was found painted on the window of President Barack Obama’s campaign office in a Denver, Colo., suburb late Thursday.

The black Nazi symbol was found by building owners painted outside a window of the office, located in the Denver suburb of Conifer, 9News.com reported. The office opened recently in the Jefferson County hamlet.

The Jefferson County sheriff’s office did not immediately return a request for comment. 9News.com reports that Obama’s campaign has not commented on the incident, which comes a week after a shot was fired into a window of Obama’s Denver campaign office.

In 2009 during a Tea Party rally held to oppose the stimulus package on the day Obama signed the bill, a participant waved a sign bearing a swastika in the “O” of Obama’s name. The sign holder had a picture taken with conservative activist Michelle Malkin and was reportedly on stage when then-state Senate Minority Leader Josh Penry (R-Grand Junction) spoke.

The swastika incident occurs two weeks after an Obama supporter in Tulsa, Okla., who had an Obama sign on his lawn reported receiving  a death threat from a neighbor. Kyle Counts, a 27-year-old law student, told HuffPost that the neighbor engaged him an argument after seeing the sign and then yelled the threat, which was captured on video.

UPDATE: 7:55 p.m. — Scott Lorditch, a volunteer at the Conifer office, told The Huffington Post that when he arrived at the office on Friday, staffers told him the vandalism occurred overnight. Lorditch said that Obama lawn signs in front of the office were also shredded. He said that while he did not see the damaged signs, when he arrived the signs were no longer in front of the office.

6 Comments

Filed under Radical Right

Obama’s ‘Let Mitt beat Mitt’ strategy

Ingenious…

Daily Kos

The Obama campaign responds to Mitt Romney whining about ”inaccurate portrayals of my positions” with a video of Mitt Romney setting the record straight, in his own words.

Mitt Romney claims that he’ll use next Wednesday’s debate to challenge the credibility of attacks against his candidacy, but as this video shows, he is going to have trouble making that case. I guess Romney could complain that instead of regurgitating his campaign’s current talking points, the video includes clips from some guy accusing Mitt Romney of taking deeply unpopular positions. The problem is that the guy going after Mitt Romney … is Mitt Romney.

If Romney wants to whine about it during the debate, all President Obama has to do is tell people to go on YouTube and make up their own minds about who is telling the truth: Mitt Romney … or Mitt Romney. It’s the let “Let Mitt beat Mitt” strategy.

2 Comments

Filed under U.S. Politics

Mitt Romney Makes Birth Certificate Joke

From the beginning of his campaign, Mitt Romney has often portrayed President Obama as being some “other”.  Using terms like: “He doesn’t share American values”, “not like Americans” “Foreign vision of the country”, etc.  doesn’t convince me that he didn’t mean to say what he did…as a swipe against the president.

So to say that Romney was “just making an observation”  and that he believes the president was born in the United States, is pure rhetoric.

Having the most influential birther in this country as a surrogate and donor (Donald Trump) doesn’t help either

The Huffington Post

Mitt Romney made a joke about his birth certificate at a rally in Commerce, Mich. on Friday.

Speaking about his Michigan roots, he said, “No one’s ever asked to see my birth certificate. They know that this is the place that we were born and raised.”

The joke was received with hearty applause by the audience. Still, it was an awkward moment for the candidate to play on the birther conspiracies that have plagued Barack Obama since he ran for president in 2008, even after the president released his “long-form” birth certificate in 2011.

The Obama campaign quickly responded, with spokesman Ben LaBolt saying that Romney was embracing the most extreme elements in the conservative movement.

“Throughout this campaign, Governor Romney has embraced the most strident voices in his party instead of standing up to them,” he said. “It’s one thing to give the stage in Tampa to Donald Trump, Sheriff Arpaio, and Kris Kobach. But Governor Romney’s decision to directly enlist himself in the birther movement should give pause to any rational voter across America.”

Romney adviser Kevin Madden played down the joke, saying Romney was “only referencing that Michigan, where he is campaigning today, is the state where he himself was born and raised.”

Mitt Romney’s own birth certificate was released by Reuters on the same day when the candidate appeared with Donald Trump, who loudly amplified doubts about the president’s birthplace.

Romney’s son Matt joked earlier this year about Obama’s birth certificate, a quip for which he later apologized. Referring to his father’s tax returns, he said, “I heard that someone suggested that as soon as President Obama releases his grades, and birth certificate, and a sort of a long list of things, then maybe he will.”

Romney has said that he believes that Obama was born in the United States. “I think the citizenship test has been passed. I believe the president was born in the United States. There are real reasons to get this guy out of office,” he told Larry Kudlow in April 2011. “The man needs to be taken out of office but his citizenship isn’t the reason why.”

1 Comment

Filed under Mitt Romney

New Obama Video: We’re ‘Really Screwed Under Romney’

TPM LiveWire

The Obama campaign’s latest web video features ordinary citizens testing out the campaign’s tax calculator which allows people to compare their tax burden under President Obama’s and Mitt Romney’s tax plans. The tool was created last week and is based on the Tax Policy Center’s assessment of Romney’s plan.

“We’re still saving a ton of taxes under Obama,” says one woman, looking at the calculator. “And we are going to be…really screwed under Romney.”

Watch:

Comments Off

Filed under Taxes

Romney gets caught lying about Obama, military voters

Mitt Romney is counting on his followers to be ignorant and complacent.

He thinks those Fox News viewers (the same people who will vote for him) will believe anything he says, and he’s probably right.  The fact is he’s a bold-face liar that doesn’t deserve the Presidency.

John McCain was an honorable and worthwhile adversary back in 2008.  Romney is a sleazy wannabe politician who has the corrupt values of a Wall Street Banker…

The Rachel Maddow Blog

After spending the last several months paying attention to Mitt Romney’s habitual dishonesty at a granular level, I’ve become largely inured to his more routine, casual lies. Some of the deliberate falsehoods are just too common to get upset about.

But once in a while, Romney tells a lie so blatant and offensive that it raises questions anew about the candidate’s character and what standards of decency he’s prepared to abandon to advance his ambitions.

As Rachel explained on the show on Thursday, voting rights in Ohio have been a mess in recent cycles, and new voter-suppression tactics imposed by state Republican lawmakers are inviting “chaos” at the polls this fall. Of particular interest is a state policy that restricts early-voting rights: active-duty troops can vote up to three days before Election Day, but no one else.

To that end, President Obama’s campaign filed a lawsuit a few weeks ago, asking a federal court to “restore in-person early voting for all Ohioans during the three days prior to Election Day.” Three weeks later, Romney came up with a new response to the lawsuit, posting this message to Facebook:

“President Obama’s lawsuit claiming it is unconstitutional for Ohio to allow servicemen and women extended early voting privileges during the state’s early voting period is an outrage. The brave men and women of our military make tremendous sacrifices to protect and defend our freedoms, and we should do everything we can to protect their fundamental right to vote. I stand with the fifteen military groups that are defending the rights of military voters, and if I’m entrusted to be the commander-in-chief, I’ll work to protect the voting rights of our military, not undermine them.”

Got that? Obama wants all eligible Ohio voters, including servicemen and women, to have the same ability to vote, which Romney says, in writing, means Obama is trying to “undermine” the troops’ ability to vote.

This is as loathsome a lie as Romney has told all year — and given his record, that’s not an easy threshold to meet.

Continue reading here…

Related articles

Comments Off

Filed under Mitt Romney Lies

No, Romney Didn’t Leave Bain in 1999

No, Romney Didn’t Leave Bain in 1999

Talking Points Memo Editor’s Blog

A central element of the 2012 campaign cycle has become just when Mitt Romney left Bain Capital. The Romney campaign says he left in early 1999 — in time to get him off the hook for some controversial investments. Factcheck.org backs up Mitt while David Corn and the Obama campaign have brought forward numerous pieces of documentary evidence indicating he didn’t leave until a couple years later.

Now here’s even more evidence that he didn’t leave in 1999 as he now claims.

The gist of the disagreement comes down to this: There’s no question that numerous public filings and some contemporaneous press references say Romney was still running things at Bain after 1999. But his campaign insists that whatever securities filings may have said, in practice, he was so busy running the 2002 Winter Olympics that he actually had no role at Bain after early 1999. That’s possible in theory. But there’s no evidence for it besides self-interested claims by Romney. And there’s plenty of documentary evidence to the contrary. After all, what you tell the SEC is really supposed to be true.

But here’s the thing. I’ve found yet more instances where Romney made declarations to the SEC that he was still involved in running Bain after February 1999. To the best of my knowledge, no one has yet noted these.

The documents go into different aspects of Romney’s ownership of various Bain and Bain related assets. But in both Romney had to say what he currently did for a living.

Here are two SEC filings from July 2000 and February 2001 in which Romney lists his “principal occupation” as “Managing Director of Bain Capital, Inc.”

image content

Romney’s argument is that it doesn’t matter what he said on these SEC filings. Whatever they say, he really wasn’t at Bain anymore. But absent of any evidence, how is it that anyone can be expected to disregard what Mitt actually told the SEC at the time?

3 Comments

Filed under Mitt Romney

New Obama campaign video hits Mitt Romney’s record as governor

Clearly, this is a topic that Mitt Romney does not want to talk about…

Daily Kos

The newest video from the Obama campaign is a four-plus minute indictment of Mitt Romney’s record as governor of Massachusetts—and a reminder that, as he is doing in 2012, Mitt Romney in 2002 staked his campaign on his experience at Bain Capital, saying that his private sector record would enable him to bring jobs to Massachusetts.

But as the video points out, Mitt Romney had a miserable record of job creation in Massachusetts. Under his leadership, the state ranked 47th in the nation.  He now defends that lousy record by saying he inherited a recession, but not only did President Obama inherit an even deeper and longer lasting recession, but an apples-to-apples comparison of President Obama’s and Mitt Romney’s jobs records shows that Obama has had the better one.

The video also hits Romney for failing to keep his promises to get the state out of debt and in not raising taxes and fees. According to the video, the state’s debt increased $2.6 billion during Romney’s one term in office and he raised more fees than any other state in the nation in his first year in office.

The video is clearly targeted at people who are following the campaign closely—it isn’t in the style of a 30-second or minute-long ad—and the testimonials from public officials in Massachusetts aren’t nearly as emotionally gripping as testimonials from workers whose lives were upended by Mitt Romney at Bain. And Bain itself is basically missing from the video, except for the clips at the beginning of Mitt Romney saying in both 2002 and 2012 that his private sector experience will enable him to create jobs. But while the video itself isn’t a summer blockbuster, it does contain all the fundamental elements that we’ll see in attacks on Romney’s economic record in Massachusetts as the campaign progresses.

We’ll probably see other elements of Romney’s Massachusetts record as well—specifically, Romneycare and his flip-flop on abortion—but as far as the economy goes, the video makes the core argument that we’ll be hearing throughout this election: that Mitt Romney’s claim to be an economic savant is no more credible in 2012 than it was in 2002, and the proof is in his record as governor—a record which Mitt Romney, not surprisingly, does not want to discuss.

Comments Off

Filed under Mitt Romney