History will not be kind to these types of critics…
Republican operative Ralph Reed is projecting:
Projection: According to Sigmund Freud, projection is a psychological defense mechanism whereby one “projects” one’s own undesirable thoughts, motivations, desires, and feelings onto someone else. (Wiki)
Everything he describes in the video below is what the GOP has done and is still doing to this day against president Obama…
President Barack Obama’s campaign will do anything to get him elected, GOP political operative Ralph Reed told Florida Republicans Feb. 16.
“So if you can’t run on your economic record, you can’t run on your foreign policy record, there’s only one kind of campaign to run,” Reed said. “And that is a scorched earth, negative, ‘tear down the Republican nominee’ campaign. And that’s all this is going to be. And they’re coming, and they’re coming with a knife in an alley. That’s what this fight is going to be like.”
Reed told his audience not to underestimate Obama or his campaign team.
“There is nothing they will not do to win an election,” Reed said. “This guy is as tough and as mean and as cynical as any politician you’ll ever see. There is nothing he’s not willing to do.”
Reed is the founder of the Faith and Freedom Foundation and former head of the Christian Coalition. In 2006, he ran for lieutenant governor of Georgia but lost in the primary, partially due to the disclosure of business ties to disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff.
The remarks were originally taped by Conservative New Media and picked up by Right Wing Watch.
Despite trailing Rick Santorum in most recent national polls, Mitt Romney appears to have momentum on his side in Michigan and a big lead in Arizona, just four days before both states hold Republican presidential primaries.
In Michigan, two new automated, recorded-voice surveys show Romney with a small, single-digit lead. The two polls, from Rasmussen Reports and Mitchell Research , were both conducted on Thursday, Feb. 23, and are the first to be fielded in Michigan entirely following Wednesday night’s nationally televised candidate debate.
The Rasmussen Reports poll gives Romney a six-point lead over Santorum (40 to 34 percent), a reversal from the four-point Romney deficit the firm found just three days earlier. The Mitchell Research poll shows Romney three points ahead of Santorum (36 to 33 percent), a big shift from the nine-point Santorum lead the firm reported one week earlier.
The new findings are slightly better for Romney than the results of five other surveys conducted earlier in the week, which collectively described a very close race between the top two candidates, ranging from a four-point Santorum lead to a two-point Romney advantage.
The HuffPost Pollster’s Michigan chart, which attempts to smooth out random variation in the all public polling data, shows that the biggest change over the past week has been an increase in support for Romney. Over the same period, Santorum’s numbers have declined only slightly. The chart’s trend lines now give Romney a very slight lead over Santorum (36.3 to 34.7 percent), followed by Ron Paul (11.2 percent) and Newt Gingrich (8.0 percent).
- Mitt Romney’s negative advertising hasn’t worked on Rick Santorum (blogs.telegraph.co.uk)
- Michigan Polls Narrow: Will Mitt Romney Overtake Rick Santorum? (huffingtonpost.com)
- Mitt Romney Adviser: ‘We’re Going To Win Michigan’ (huffingtonpost.com)
- Gallup: Romney up by four on Obama (thehill.com)
- Romney Holds Edge in Michigan (politicalwire.com)
- Daily Kos Elections Polling Wrap: A tenuous status quo for Mitt Romney (dailykos.com)
Rick Santorum Cast Himself As ‘Progressive Conservative,’ Non-Reaganite In First Campaign
Making his first run for Congress in the early 1990s, this candidate promised not to be a Reagan Republican, fashioned himself a progressive conservative, said he was impartial on unions and stayed vague on abortion rights.
It’s a description that fits Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor whose past political pursuits in that state have weighed down his current presidential ambitions. But in this case, it applies to former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, whose own political origins have been explored in far less depth.
In his circuitous path to the top of the primary polls, Santorum has presented himself as the pure conservative alternative to Romney. But an extensive review of newspaper archives and interviews with officials involved in his successful 1990 congressional race against Rep. Doug Walgren (D-Pa.) suggests that Santorum was cut from a similar GOP cloth as his current adversary.
Take, for instance, a November 3, 1990, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette article, in which Santorum distanced himself from Ronald Reagan.
Santorum insisted that he was the one who is more in touch. ‘From child care to taxes, we’re right for this district. This district has had enough of government sticking its nose constantly in our business,’ he said, insisting nonetheless that he is not a Reagan Republican.
The Reagan line echoes Romney’s own memorable remark from his 1994 Senate campaign, when he said that he didn’t “want to return to Reagan-Bush.”
Santorum reportedly made a similar statement on a separate occasion. According to an October 28, 1990 piece in the Pittsburgh Press, the afternoon newspaper that eventually became part of thePost-Gazette, he described himself as a “progressive conservative” in his campaign manual.
- Megadeth Lead Singer Endorses Rick Santorum (newsfeed.time.com)
- HUFFPOST HILL – Rick Santorum: Progressive (huffingtonpost.com)
- Mitt Romney Gets Hit by Santorum in Latest Attack Ad [VIDEO] (ibtimes.com)
- Santorum Flip-Flopped On Abortion While Running In A Blue District, Called Himself “Progressive Conservative” (minx.cc)
- Rick Santorum Launches Ad Featuring Something That Looks Like the Other Santorum [Video] (jezebel.com)
- Mitt Romney’s New Campaign Strategy is to Sideline Santorum [Video] (inquisitr.com)
- SHOCK ENDORSEMENT: This Heavy Metal Rocker Is Backing Rick Santorum (businessinsider.com)
- Jonathan Chait Explains Why Santorum Can Win (tarpon.wordpress.com)
- The Santorum Surge Is Real-NOT the Flavor of the Month #tcot #prolife (littlebytesnews.blogspot.com)
- Obama campaign targets Santorum (politico.com)
It’s my firm believe that the cockroach will not be the only survivor of a nuclear holocaust. It’s possible that Orly Taitz will be among the surviving species as well.
No matter how many times the Court has knocked her down by dismissing her cases before them, she gets back up and continues her frenetic attempts for someone in a judicial capacity to not only hear what she has to say, but to adjudicate her findings.
Orly Taitz took her anti-Obama birther crusade to GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich on Monday, only to come up empty-handed. Again.
At a campaign event in Pasadena, Calif., Gingrich took questions after delivering a stump speech blasting , among other things, “President Obama’s war on the Catholic Church” and the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which recently overturned California’s same-sex marriage ban.
After answering concerns about the state of his campaign following a slide in recent polls and primary contests, Taitz came forward, suggesting that the birther issue could provide a “boost ” to his candidacy if he made it a hallmark issue.
“Somebody who wouldn’t be good enough, who wouldn’t be certified to pick tomatoes or clean bathrooms is sitting in the White House,” Taitz told Gingrich, reportedly to a mixed reception from the largely Tea Party audience.
“That’s a project you should pursue,” Gingrich responded. He went on to say that with ongoing economic issues and other mismanagement he saw in the president’s agenda, he had “enough issues to debate Obama about.”
Taitz, a California attorney and dentist, is one of the most outspoken members of the birther movement, whose adherents claim that Obama is ineligible to serve as president because he isn’t actually a U.S. citizen. (In fact, the White House has released the president’s long-form birth certificate, in hopes of quelling the conspiracy theories.) Taitz, who specifically believes that the president has forged his official documents, made something of a stir in Georgia last month when a judge subpoenaed Obama in a case her clients had filed attempting to bar Obama from the state’s primary ballot. Obama’s legal team ignored the judge’s order, however, and the case proceeded without him. It was eventually dismissed by the judge, who determined that Obama was eligible to be on Georgia’s primary ballot in March.
- Obama to appear at hearing; attorney Orly Taitz says it will be ‘100 times bigger than Watergate’ (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
- Orly Taitz loses birther case to an empty table (kaystreet.wordpress.com)
- Gingrich: I’m Not Going Anywhere (washington.cbslocal.com)
- “Thank you God! I can now depose Obama…” – Attorney Orly Taitz (loopyloo305.com)
- Georgia Judge Says Birther Orly Taitz Can Question President, Orders Obama to Appear in Court (littlegreenfootballs.com)
- Birthers Attempt To Remove Obama From New Hampshire Primary (kaystreet.wordpress.com)
- Mike Huckabee Solidifies His Birther Creds (kaystreet.wordpress.com)
This is far from over, but the one thing this does assure, is that Scott Walker will have to run for his seat again, and given the fact that one million signatures were collected to force a recall election, I’m not certain that he will win a second time. In this case, I believe “voters remorse” will be the one driving force that will kick Walker out…
Democrats needed to collect 540,208 signatures to trigger a gubernatorial recall election against Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R). On Tuesday, they announced they had far exceeded that number, collecting more than one million signatures.
Tuesday was the deadline for recall organizers, led by the group United Wisconsin, to turn in their petitions. The number collected is 185 percent of the signatures required to force a recall election. Organizers also collected enough to trigger a recalls of the lieutenant governor and four Republican state senators.
The total went far beyond Walker’s expectations.
“From what they say, they’re probably going to turn in 720,000 today,” Walker said in an interview with right-wing radio host Rush Limbaugh Tuesday afternoon. “That’s a lot of signatures, but they’ve been planning this since late last spring. They’ve got tons of money from the big government unions in Washington and around the country.”
A Walker recall is the next step in a campaign to oust state Republicans who pushed forward controversial budget legislation stripping state employees of their collective bargaining rights. In August, Democrats successfully recalled two Republican state senators from office, but they fell short of the three needed to take control of the chamber.
- Recall Election In Wisconsin Appears Likely (chicago.cbslocal.com)
- Michigan’s Governor Called Out During Scott Walker Recall (unaskedadvice.wordpress.com)
- Wisconsin: Scott Walker could face a recall very freaking soon, guys (shortformblog.tumblr.com)
- Democrats Submit 1 Million Signatures to Recall Walker (politicalwire.com)
- Wisconsin Democrats to submit one million signatures to recall Scott Walker (dailykos.com)
- Report: 1M Signatures in Wis. Recall (myfoxny.com)
- Recall looms for Wis. Gov. Scott Walker (cbsnews.com)
- Groups filing signatures to recall Wis. gov. (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- Republicans on the run: 58% support Scott Walker recall on eve of WI deadline (dangerousminds.net)
Sure Gov. Romney…sure.
Mitt Romney said Saturday night that it pains him to fire workers in order to make a company more profitable, responding to criticism from Newt Gingrich, who cited a New York Times story on one of Romney’s ventures.
“It always pains you if you have to be in a position of downsizing a business in order to make it more successful,” Romney said. “I’m not surprised to have the New York Times try to put free enterprise on trial…It’s a little surprising from my colleagues on this stage.”
Former Massachusetts Gov. Romney said that the laid-off workers are victims of the free market. “Sometimes investments don’t work and you’re not successful,” he said.
But Gingrich, the former House Speaker, questioned whether Romney’s private equity ventures were aimed at creating jobs or quick profit for capitalists.
Gingrich said he’s all for the free market, but “I’m not nearly enamored of a Wall Street model where you can go in and flip companies, have leveraged buyouts, basically take out all the money, leaving behind the workers.”
He cited 1,700 fired workers in a New York Times story on one of Romney’s corporate raids.
“If it’s factually accurate, it raises questions,” he said.
- Republican Debate: ‘Mitt’s Gonna Need To Wear A Flak Jacket Tonight’ In New Hampshire (huffingtonpost.com)
- Mitt Romney Endorsed By Former US Ambassadors To Vatican (lezgetreal.com)
- THERE WILL BE BLOOD: Mitt Romney Is In For A Hellish Saturday Night (businessinsider.com)
- Pro-Newt PAC Seeks Revenge Against Romney (newser.com)
- Gingrich Ramps Up Anti-Romney Message (foxnews.com)
It looks like the Old Senator is losing his grip on reality. This occured yesterday.
Today he did the same thing.
While speaking at a campaign rally Thursday in support of GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) mistakenly professed his faith in President Barack Obama’s ability to improve the economy.
“I am confident, with the leadership and the backing of the American people, President Obama will turn this country around,” McCain said, as seen above in a video from Goose Creek Patch.
McCain — who endorsed Romney on Wednesdayjust after the GOP hopeful won the Iowa Caucus by a razor-thin margin — appeared at the rally in Charleston, S.C., along with fellow Romney supporter Gov. Nikki Haley (R-S.C.).
The crowd, as well as Haley and Romney, quickly realized McCain’s error. Haley leaned in to correct McCain, grabbing his elbow.
“Excuse me, President Romney,” McCain said.
The Obama-Romney mix-up wasn’t the only awkward moment during McCain’s appearance. According to BuzzFeed’s Zeke Miller, McCain made a comment about Clemson University’s “victories on the gridiron.”
- Oops Again: McCain Mistakenly Criticizes Romney While Candidate Stands Nearby (huffingtonpost.com)
- McCain Slams Citizens United, Throws Romney Charge Back At Obama (huffingtonpost.com)
- With friends like McCain, who needs…. (fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com)
- McCain Flubs Hit on Gingrich, Santorum While Stumping for Romney (abcnews.go.com)
- Oops: John McCain Accidentally Suggests Mitt Romney Likes Earmarks… Right In Front Of Romney (mediaite.com)
Oh my goodness! Recently, I may have “falsely” reported that Rick Santorum insulted black folks. Mr. Santorum vehemently denies that he ever said: I don’t want to make black people’s lives better by giving them other people’s money.
Oh, wait, there’s video of Mr. Santorum making “the” statement and we all know that this is the information age and everything is recorded in one way or the other. So, why would Mr. Santorum deny saying that he doesn’t want to give Black people other people’s money?
No wonder Newt Gingrich has attached himself to Santorum, they speak the same language.
Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum denied recently making comments about “black people’s lives” after receiving criticism for the remarks.
Santorum took heat after saying, “I don’t want to make black people’s lives better by giving them somebody else’s money.” During an appearance on FOX News Channel’s “The O’Reilly Factor,” he denied ever making the comments, saying the remark was the result of “a little bit of a blurred word.”
“I looked at that, and I didn’t say that,” Santorum told O’Reilly. “If you look at it, what I started to say is a word and then sort of changed and it sort of — blah — came out. And people said I said ‘black.’ I didn’t.”
The GOP hopeful touted his past help of black colleges to further defend himself against criticism over the claims.
“And I can tell you, I don’t use — I don’t — first off, I don’t use the term ‘black’ very often. I use the term ‘African-American’ more than I use ‘black,” Santorum said. “I can tell you as someone who did more work for historically black colleges, I used to have — every year, I used to bring all the historically black colleges into Washington, DC to try to help them, because they get very little federal money through the bureaucracy, and so I help to try to introduce them to people in the Department of Education so they could have more resources.”
Santorum also got defensive over his presidential run less than a day after he took a close second place at the 2012 Iowa Caucuses, saying this campaign “isn’t my first rodeo.”
“I’ve been in a lot of tough campaigns in Pennsylvania,” Santorum said when asked if he is “ready to be demonized.”
“We’re going to have resources,” Santorum said. “We’re going to be a much bigger player than I think everybody anticipates right now.”
- Did Rick Santorum Make a Racist Remark About Black People and ‘Entitlements?’ (inquisitr.com)
- Rick Santorum denies making ‘black people’ welfare comment (thegrio.com)
- Bill O’Reilly Grills Rick Santorum On Social Issues, ‘Black People’ Comment (mediaite.com)
- Some of Rick Santorum’s Best Friends Are Black (slog.thestranger.com)
- Are Republican Front Runners Racist? Here’s Your Guide… (kaystreet.wordpress.com)
- Santorum doesn’t recall ‘black people’ and ‘welfare’ comment, cites work with Michael Steele (thegrio.com)
There was a point (see here) when I thought a primary challenge to Obama could easily come from within the Dem power structure. Obama seemed that vulnerable.
And I assumed that Hillary was positioning herself to be that person. In 1968, RFK didn’t declare his candidacy until Gene McCarthy had fatally wounded Johnson, making a safe entry possible. I saw the same strategy back then for a Clinton challenge for the crown in 2012.
But the moment passed, and hopes for a primary challenge seemed to have dimmed. (“Seemed”? Yes.)
Not only that, but the Clinton and Obama machines seem to have merged; certainly the CEOs of those machines are more and more aligned.
So I find this the next logical step — Hillary Clinton as the 2012 VP nominee. This makes her a shoe-in for the nomination in 2016 (assuming no horrid misstep betwixt), and possibly pres as well, given the current state of the opposition. So everyone’s happy:
- ▪ Obama can’t run again and the Dems need an heir.
- ▪ His daughters are too young for their dynastic turn.
- ▪ The Clintons still want it.
- ▪ Hillary as heir-apparent gives both her and the Dems another 4–8 years on the throne.
Sweet deal for them. Let Chelsea and Sasha duke it out, come their turn to seek power. That will be later; this will be now.
Here’s Robert Reich, who might know a thing or two about the Clintons, on this subject (my emphasis):
My political prediction for 2012 (based on absolutely no inside information): Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden swap places. Biden becomes Secretary of State — a position he’s apparently coveted for years. And Hillary Clinton, Vice President.
So the Democratic ticket for 2012 is Obama-Clinton. … Obama needs to stir the passions and enthusiasms of a Democratic base that’s been disillusioned with his cave-ins to regressive Republicans. Hillary Clinton on the ticket can do that. … Clinton would help deflect attention from the bad economy and put it on foreign policy, where she and Obama have shined.
Sign me up — I think Reich makes the good call.
Am I liking this? Do you think I think we need 8 more years of progressive dreams deferred? That would be No.
But my dreams are beside the point, aren’t they. You and me, we’re just God’s spies, inspecting the mystery of things. Birds in a cage, as it were.
- Robert Reich: My Political Prediction for 2012: It’s Obama-Clinton (huffingtonpost.com)
- Obama to Name Hillary Vp for 2012 (weeklyworldnews.com)
- Oy a broch, Obama-Clinton?! (bokertov.typepad.com)
- Robert Reich: Obama-hillary 2012 (maboulette.wordpress.com)
- Obama/Clinton 2012 (kottke.org)
- Obama-Clinton Ticket For 2012. Some Analyst Think It’s Needed To Win (inquisitr.com)
- Will Biden and Clinton Switch Jobs? (politicalwire.com)
- Debunking Yet Another Obama-Clinton Fantasy, Two of Them Actually (outsidethebeltway.com)