Author: kstreet607

Politics! Politics! I love politics! Unapologetic Barack Obama enthusiast.

Oh-you-thought-there-was-no-more-emails-but-guess-what-there’s-an-EMAIL!

Hillary Clinton checks her Blackberry in 2009.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

VOX SENTENCES

There’s more Hillary Clinton email drama; same-sex marriage opponents make their sad, pathetic last stand; and some musings on self-driving cars.

  • Oh you thought the whole Hillary Clinton email drama was over? WRONG it was not over.
  • The State Department posted 4,368 documents, totaling 7,121 pages, in the latest monthly disclosure of emails sent and received by Clinton during her time as Secretary. [NYT / Peter Baker and Michael Schmidt]
  • The emails are a good reminder that DC is considerable more like Veepthan it is like House of Cards. Clinton literally sent an email with the subject line “Gefilte fish” and body text, “Where are we on this?” [Vox / Matt Yglesias]
  • Sidney Blumenthal, Clinton’s close confidant who Obama loyalists blocked from joining the State Department, sent a decent fraction of the emails released, including one where he calls John Boehner an alcoholic. Here’s what you need to know about Blumenthal. [Vox / Dylan Matthews]
  • Some of the emails are actually revealing. One from special Israel-Palestine envoy Martin Indyk includes a detailed analysis of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s approach to the peace process, and why Netanyahu was bungling prospects for a deal. [Vox / Max Fisher]
  • If you want to dig in, here are 21 of the most notable emails. My favorite is the one where Clinton ally David Brock outlines a harebrained scheme to impeach Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. [Politico / Nick Gass]

Dylan Matthews and Dara Lind.

Not Satisfied With His War On Immigrants, Trump Picks A Fight With Native Americans

Donald Trump, making Denali McKinley again. | CREDIT: GRAPHIC BY DYLAN PETROHILOS/SHUTTERSTOCK/AP PHOTO

THINK PROGRESS

It was a show of respect to Native Americans when President Obama on Sunday restored the name of the nation’s tallest mountain, formerly called Mount McKinley, to Denali. So it makes a lot of sense that presidential candidate Donald Trump didn’t like it.

On Tuesday, the Republican front-runner promised that he would reverse Obama’s decision if elected president. Restoring the mountain’s name to Denali, he said, was a “great insult to Ohio,” because former President William McKinley was born there. To be clear, Denali is located in Alaska, about 3,000 miles away from Ohio.

It’s unsurprising that Trump did not express concern for insulting Alaska Natives, who have been calling the mountain Denali for thousands of years. The billionaire has a historically hostile relationship with Native Americans, largely stemming from the fact that his casino business competes with tribe-owned casinos. But it was never solely business dealings that soured the relationship — it was Trump’s willingness to invoke offensive, sometimes racially-charged language to come out of those dealings on top.

The most egregious example of this came in 2000 in upstate New York, when Trump began bankrolling an ad campaign to stop a casino from being built in the Catskills. As the New York Times reported last month, the local newspaper ads showed “hypodermic needles and drug paraphernalia … [and] warned in dire terms that violent criminals were coming to town.”

“Are these the kind of neighbors we want?” the ad asked, referring to the St. Regis Mohawks Tribe at Akwesasne, which was planning to build the casino. “The St. Regis Mohawk record of criminal activity is well-documented.”

When the ads came out, Akwesasne Mohwaks were incensed. The uproar was documented in a book called Enduring Legacies, which explains that while there was some illegal activity within the tribe, “implying that all Akwesasne Mohawks support such activities is something of a racial slur.” The advertising, it asserted, was “clearly informed by the racist attitudes prevailing in the area” at the time. Local tribal leaders also took out their own newspaper ads in response to Trump’s. “How dare they smear a nation and brand us all as criminals,” it read.

It’s also worth noting that Trump initially tried to conceal his involvement in those ads. At the time they were released, the anti-Mohawks ads were put forth by an anti-casino group called the New York Institute for Law and Society. It wasn’t until New York’s state lobbying commission began investigating Trump’s funding of the organization that he admitted he was its primary funder. According to the Times, Trump entered into a settlement with the commission in which he was forced to pay a fine and apologize — “not for the content of the anti-Mohawk ads, but for evading state disclosure rules related to lobbying and political advocacy.”

A spokesperson for Trump did not return ThinkProgress’ request for comment. But in that article, Trump maintained he didn’t mean to racially insult the tribe. “I wasn’t knocking the Mohawks; I was knocking their record,” he said. “That’s not because they’re Mohawks. That’s because their record is bad and was proved to be bad at the time.”

But it wasn’t the only time he had made inflammatory remarks about Native Americans.

Back in 1993, Trump gave testimony to the Congressional Subcommittee Native American Affairs. A casino in Connecticut, owned by the Pequot Indians, had just become the most popular one in America, surpassing Trump’s casino in Atlantic City. Trump was unhappy about this, and accused the casino owners of not being authentic Native Americans.

“‘They don’t look like Indians to me,” he said, “and they don’t look like Indians to Indians.” AMediaite report noted that The Pequot have had centuries on interbreeding after being largely massacred by English settlers in the 1600s, so many have Caucasian features.

At the subcommittee hearing, Trump then began railing against the idea that Native Americans should be able to own casinos at all, due to organized crime. If they continued to be allowed, hesaid at the time, “you’re going to have the biggest organized crime problem in the history of this country. Al Capone is going to look like a baby.”

“It’s going to blow,” he continued. “It’s just a question of time, and when it blows you are going to have a lot of very embarrassed faces sitting right where you folks are sitting right now.”

Reporting from the hearing noted “gasps and puzzled looks of disbelief” from the mostly-Native American audience, and a rebuttal from an FBI official who said he had “found no evidence of skimming, money laundering, theft or any other criminal activity in Indian gaming.” To this day, the accusations haven’t panned out.

What also hasn’t panned out since then is a clear effort from Trump, now the front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination, to smooth or improve his relationship with Native Americans. And in that department, his decision to reverse Denali’s name back to McKinley surely won’t do him any favors.

EMILY ATKIN

Ben Carson, Advancing in Polls, Is a Sharp Contrast to Donald Trump

GETTY IMAGES

When I was a little girl and heard my parents use the term “six in one…one half dozen in the other…” the phrase often drew my attention.  As I grew older and researched the idiom I learned that it meant:   The two alternatives are equivalent or indifferent; it doesn’t matter which one we choose.

That sentence aptly describes Donald Trump and the distant runner-up in the GOP campaign, Dr. Ben Carson due to their extreme conservative political views.  Therefore as an observer of the current GOP political race for POTUS I see no difference in the two men.

THE NEW YORK TIMES

The spotlight rarely found Ben Carson this summer. While other presidential candidates shot flaming arrows at rivals and sometimes the news media, the soft-spoken Mr. Carson seemed to struggle to be noticed. “Well, thank you,” he told moderators in the first Republican debate. “I wasn’t sure if I would get to speak again.”

But while almost all Republicans were upstaged by the bombast of Donald J. Trump in recent months, Mr. Carson, a retired neurosurgeon whose low-key personality and celebrated medical career are the antithesis of a politician’s usual path, has gained ground as few seemed to notice.

A recent Quinnipiac University national poll placed him in second place in the Republican field, and a Monmouth University survey of Iowa Republicans released on Monday had him tied with Mr. Trump. Another Iowa poll, by The Des Moines Register and Bloomberg, had the two candidates running closely within the poll’s margin of sampling error.

Like Mr. Trump, Mr. Carson has never held elected office, a quality that seems particularly prized by Republican voters this year. More than 90 percent of voters in the Register/Bloomberg poll conducted, last week, said they were unsatisfied or “mad as hell” with government and politicians.

And yet, in almost every other way, Mr. Carson is Mr. Trump’s opposite. He is almost professorial, where Mr. Trump is loud, combative and unfiltered.

“At the end of the day, I attribute it to the power of nice,” said Rob Taylor, a chairman of Mr. Carson’s campaign in Iowa, reflecting on the rise of his candidate.

Mr. Carson has worked hard to tame his habit of making highly provocative statements, often on homosexuality, a move that advisers said had saved his campaign after it nearly derailed amid negative early headlines. They predicted that Mr. Trump’s own tendency toward such statements, whether directed at illegal immigrants or in personal attacks on Twitter, could undermine his headline-grabbing run.

“We’ve been there and realize no matter how much the base will love you for it, people will not think it’s presidential,” said Armstrong Williams, a close adviser to Mr. Carson.

Mr. Carson’s campaign did not immediately respond on Tuesday to requests to interview him.

Continue reading here>>>

Pope Francis Makes A Bold Move On Abortion That Will Outrage The Christian Right

Pope Francis - Audience with the media

Getty Images

ADDICTING INFO

In an astonishing gesture for a Catholic Pontiff, Pope Francis has encouraged priests to pardon women who undergo abortions. This is the closest thing to a pro-choice action we may ever see from any head of the Catholic church.

During a speech on Tuesday, in which the pope detailed measures for the jubilee, he said that while “the tragedy of abortion is experienced by some with a superficial awareness … many others … believe that they have no other option”.

He stated that he “met so many women who bear in their heart the scar of this agonising and painful decision” and therefore:

“I have decided, notwithstanding anything to the contrary, to concede to all priests for the jubilee year the discretion to absolve of the sin of abortion those who have procured it and who, with contrite heart, seek forgiveness for it,”

The move will likely fall short of the permanent and unconditional pro-choice demands that many have called for. Many women might argue: “We don’t need forgiveness, we have done nothing wrong.”

They would be right.

That said, this action flies in the face of traditionalist hardliners within the Catholic faith, and Christian Conservatives everywhere. It is nothing short of radical.

The timing of this move should also raise eyebrows in American politics.

For election 2016, the entire field of GOP presidential hopefuls has become hard-line anti-abortion. GOP front runner Donald Trump has come out against abortion since he declared his intentions to run as Republican candidate. Jeb Bush, Rick SantorumMike Huckabee and Ted Cruz would grant constitutional rights to fertilized eggs (criminalizing women as murderers for choosing not to continue a pregnancy from the moment of fertilization). Scott Walker, Rand Paul and Ben Carson all back banning abortions after 20 weeks, even in cases of rape, incest or if there is a risk to the life of the pregnant women.

It is fair to say that none of these GOP hopefuls will be supporting the move of Pope Francis to show some compassion towards the women making the tough decisions. It’s the show of compassion that will outrage them most – because it reminds us that their own actions are not spiritually sound. The animosity and contempt shown to women by the Christian Conservative movement is not driven by the word of God, but by their own personal prejudices. In the pope, we have a religious leader who is not pandering to those prejudices, but confronting them head on.

The deeply disturbing lie that the death of a Texas officer is connected to Black Lives Matter

Segment on the death of Darren Goforth

attribution: Screenshot of CBS News | Segment on the death of Darren Goforth

DAILY KOS

This past week in Houston, Texas a white police officer, Darren Goforth, was fatally shot and killed by a black man with a lengthy and violent criminal history. It was a horrendous crime. Thankfully, the alleged perpetrator, Shannon Miles, has already been arrested.

Typically, people who harm police officers don’t make it far before they are caught and either charged or killed. This case was no different.

What was different, and extremely disturbing, was when Harris County Sheriff Ron Hickman attempted to draw a ridiculous connection between the peaceful Black Lives Matter movement and the murder of this officer.

The two have absolutely nothing to do with one another.

Both the official Black Lives Matter organization, its representatives, and its loosely connected friends and partners actually have real agendas, real goals, real plans, and none of them, explicit or inferred, has ever suggested violence against police.

This man wasn’t given any orders or inspired by any Black Lives Matter leaders to do what he did. No op-eds or speeches or workshops or emails from Black Lives Matter leaders have even hinted at violence toward police and any attempt to say such a thing is racist in and of itself.

Just because this man who killed Officer Goforth was black, doesn’t make him a part of this movement any more than being white qualifies you as a member of the Ku Klux Klan.

Twelve-year-old Tamir Rice was killed by police nine months ago and police and prosecutors claim to still be investigating, but days after a criminal kills a white officer, the sheriff is already making declarative statements about motive and inspiration. The double standard is thick. Justice for black victims of white police violence find investigations slow and justice rare. Somehow though, those same slow officers have indicted all of black America in this shooting of Officer Goforth.

It’s dangerous, and the statement was a reckless and unnecessary attack on a movement that is actually fighting for a more peaceful and just America.

Shaun King

Chris Christie Threatens To ‘Go Nuclear’ In The Next GOP Debate

THE HUFFINGTON POST

“We may be changing tactics.”

Ignore Chris Christie at your own risk, CNN.

The cable network will host the next Republican debate on Sept. 16, and Christie said — perhaps jokingly — that there could be fireworks if he’s ignored the way he was during last month’s debate on Fox News Channel.

On Monday’s “The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon,” the New Jersey governor and presidential candidate said that at one point during the debate, 20 questions went by with none directed at him.

“I was waiting for you to talk,” Fallon told him.

“Me too!” said Christie.

So what will be different at the second GOP debate?

Stay tuned on Sept. 16th. We may be changing tactics,” Christie said. “You know, if I get to like 15 questions in a row — count ’em at home — if I get 15 in a row, you’re going to go ‘Uh oh, he’s going to go nuclear now.'”

“That’s what I’m talking about,” Fallon said. “That’s what we want to see!”

Check it out in the clip above.

Donald Trump panders to butthurt Ohioans, promises to reverse mountain renaming

Businessman and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump waves from his SUV after a back-yard reception in Bedford, New Hampshire, June 30, 2015.  REUTERS/Dominick Reuter – RTX1IINM

DAILY KOS

Donald Trump, of course, has a position on the one issue that has overshadowed President Obama’s trip to the the Glacier Summit in Anchorage to talk global warming. And that position is, of course, in direct opposition to Obama. What’s that critical issue? Renaming a mountain.

Calling Obama’s act a “great insult to Ohio,” Trump, who is running for president next year, tweeted late Monday that Obama reversed the name the peak had for more than 100 years, in honor of President William McKinley, an Ohio native. The White House announced the Denali moniker Sunday, restoring the name that Alaska Natives had called it for thousands of years before a gold prospector named it after McKinley in the late 19th century, when he was a presidential candidate.

Of course Trump comes down on the side of imperialism. What else could you expect? The white people went into Alaska and started claiming and renaming shit and that’s the history that matters, not the previous thousands of years. Not the fact that this mountain has been a sacred place for the Alaska Natives, something that the state of Alaska itself recognized decades ago when it restored the real name of the mountain.

Not that any of that even occurred to Trump—or any of the Republicans who are so outraged. Because of course it didn’t.

Joan McCarter

Emails show Hillary’s political sleuthing

AP_125998431590.jpg

AP photo

POLITICO

A new batch of Hillary Clinton’s emails made public by the State Department Monday night show her expressing interest in the presidential aspirations of Gen. David Petraeus, who ultimately took a job as CIA director in the Obama administration instead of running for president in 2012 and was then driven out of government by scandal.

Clinton–who’s now the frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination next year–sounded intrigued when her longtime friend Sidney Blumenthal reported to her on a Saturday morning in February 2010 that prominent Washington foreign policy blogger Steve Clemons said Petraeus was talking frankly about the possibility of running for the White House.

“Clemons had dinner this week with Petraeus, who freely talked about running for president,” Blumenthal wrote to Clinton.

“Will he write about Petraeus?” Clinton wrote back five minutes later.

Moments later, Blumenthal sent Clinton Clemons’ post mentioning the off-the-record dinner and discussing the relative political merits of Petraeus, Vice President Joe Biden and Clinton herself.

“Clemons… told me more detail about [Petraeus’] attitude and interest,” Blumenthal said, adding a couple of nuggets.

Four months later, Petraeus was abruptly named the U.S. commander in Afghanistan after President Barack Obama essentially fired Gen. Stanley McCrystal over disrespectful comments his aides made about Biden. Clinton’s top communications adviser, Philippe Reines, opined that the new assignment would be seen as a way to take Petraeus, said to describe himself as a Rockefeller Republican, out of contention as a potential presidential candidate in 2012.

“My bet on the direction this now takes is two fronts 1) does Petreaus make any big changes; can he do in Afghanistan what he did in Iraq; his health; political benefits of locking him up like Huntsman,” Reines wrote to top Clinton advisers, referring to perceptions that Huntsman was out of the running for 2012 because he accepted an appointment from Obama to be U.S. Ambassador to China. The email was later forwarded to Clinton by her chief of staff, Cheryl Mills.

Huntsman did run for the GOP nomination in 2012 but did poorly and dropped out. Petraeus was named CIA director in 2011 but resigned after the 2012 elections when a federal investigation of alleged cyberstalking exposed an extramarital affair he had with his biographer.

In addition to keeping tabs on Petraeus, Clinton also expressed interest in reports that former Clinton White House Chief of Staff John Podesta was expressing criticism of Obama White House management. “Send me the next article about Podesta,” she asked Blumenthal. Previously released emails show Clinton chafing at perceived snubs from Obama’s national security team and her team in some apparent friction with then National Security Adviser Jim Jones.

In the same month as the exchanges about Petraeus, Clinton also sent Mills an article by Les Gelb arguing for a shake-up of Obama’s White House team, including the removal of Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. In the email forwarding the column, Clinton doesn’t say if she agrees or disagrees with the diagnosis or the prescription. She simply writes:”FYI.”

The new insights into Clinton’s political intelligence-gathering come from messages that are among a batch of more than 7,000 pages of emails the State Department put online Monday night, complying with a judge’s order to make monthly releases in response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. The order followed the revelation in March that Clinton exclusively used a private email account and server during her four years as secretary of state, jeopardizing earlier responses to FOIA requests and triggering Republican claims that she endangered national security by allowing sensitive messages to be stored on an unofficial system.

While dozens of senior officials and Clinton friends were in the loop about her email setup, the newly-disclosed messages show some on State’s tech support team were clearly in the dark.

“I work as a Help Desk Analyst and it has come to my attention that one of our customers has been receiving permanent fatal errors from this address, can you please confirm if you receive this message,” State Department IT specialist Christopher Butzgy wrote in a message that Clinton forwarded to top aide Huma Abedin inquiring about its contents.

“What happened is judith sent.you an email. It bounced back. She called the email help desk at state (I guess assuming u had state email) and told them that. They had no idea it was YOU, just some random address so they emailed. Sorry about that. But regardless, means ur email must be back! R u getting other messages?” Abedin emailed Clinton.

The debate over the wisdom of Clinton’s use of the private account got new fodder Monday when State declared another 125 of the former secretary’s emails classified on national security grounds. The new classifications roughly triple the number of messages on Clinton’s account now considered classified, bringing the total to 188 from 63.

However, State Department spokesman Mark Toner stressed that the information was not marked classified at the time it was sent several years ago. He also said the decision to classify the information did not represent a determination that it should have been marked or handled that way back then.

“That certainly does not speak to whether it was classified at the time it was sent, or forwarded, or received,” Toner said during the daily State Department briefing Monday afternoon, before the release. “We stand by our contention that the information we’ve upgraded was not marked classified at the time it was sent.”

At the briefing, Toner had said he expected the number of classified messages in the lastest set to be “somewhere around 150.” Asked about the final tally for this batch being about 25 fewer, State officials said Toner’s number was simply a rough estimate. They also said some of the information classified in Monday’s release was identical to information withheld in earlier batches.

The Republican National Committee called the latest release another reason to doubt Clinton can be trusted with the presidency.

“These new emails show Hillary Clinton exposed even more classified information on her secret server than previously known,” said RNC Chairman Reince Priebus in a statement. “On hundreds of occasions, Hillary Clinton’s reckless attempt to skirt transparency laws put sensitive information and our national security at risk. With the FBI continuing to investigate, Hillary Clinton’s growing email scandal shows she cannot be trusted with the White House.”

After first saying there was no classified information in her account, Clinton has said more recently that nothing was marked classified. She has said she used the private account for convenience, but that in retrospect it was a bad choice. Clinton has also described the classification system as arcane, while her aides have described it as dysfunctional.

As Clinton faces questions about whether she mishandled classified information, the emails released Monday show how she and her staff responded in late 2010 to the largest breach of classified information in U.S. history: WikiLeaks’ disclosure of 250,000 diplomatic cables. An Army intelligence analyst, Pvt. Chelsea Manning, was eventually court martialed for the leaks and sentenced to 35 years in prison.

The emails about the response to WikiLeaks–some of them classified–show U.S. officials reaching out to foreign governments to assuage them after the publication of U.S. cables calling foreign leaders corrupt.

One message forwarded to Clinton reports that Near East Affairs chief Jeffrey Feltman reached out to leaders in Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain to try to mitigate the damage done by the WikiLeaks disclosures. Much of the message was withheld from Monday’s release after being classified “CONFIDENTIAL,” although it was originally marked as “sensitive but unclassified.”

Another email forwarded to Clinton said the president of Kenya had called in the U.S. ambassador to dress him down after WikiLeaks disclosed cables saying the government was steeped in corruption.

After State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley forwarded Clinton a Swedish cartoon showing Clinton using a wrench trying to shut down the flow of information to WikiLeaks, she wrote back: “It certainly hits the mark. Can you hand me a wrench?”

“I can think of several folks for you to toss that wrench at!” Crowley replied.

While Clinton took a hard line against the WikiLeaks disclosures, the messages show that during her time as secretary she was sometimes frustrated by the mechanics of the State Department’s systems for dealing with classified and unclassified information.

When Deputy Chief of Staff Jake Sullivan told her in February 2010 he couldn’t send her a Mideast peace-related statement former British Prime Minister Tony Blair had issued, Clinton seemed irritated. “It’s a public statement! Just email it,” she wrote. Sullivan replied that it was impossible to do that because the only information was in State’s classified system. “Trust me, I share your exasperation. But until ops converts it to the unclassified email system, there is no physical way for me to email it. I can’t even access it,” Sullivan wrote.

Nearly all the information officially classified by the State Department in prior and the latest email releases involved diplomatic strategy or information provided by foreign governments. All the new classifications were at the “CONFIDENTIAL” level, the lowest tier in the U.S. classification system. So far only one message has been officially classified at a higher level, “SECRET,” although intelligence agency officials say some of the messages from Clinton’s account contain even more highly classified information.

Toner batted away questions Monday about whether State Department policy dictated that Clinton and other agency employees treat as classified information obtained in confidence from foreign officials or diplomats.

“Classification — we’ve said this many times — is not an exact science. It’s not, often, a black-and-white process,” Toner said. “There’s many strong opinions. … It’s not up to me to litigate these kinds of questions from the State Department podium.”

When releasing the messages, the State Department deletes any content deemed classified, notes the reason for the deletion, the classification level and who made the decision to classify. The agency then releases the remainder of the message unless it is subject to another Freedom of Information Act exemption.

The State Department posted the 7,121 additional pages of Clinton’s emails on the agency’s website at about 9 p.m. Monday, revealing more details from Clinton’s time as secretary of state from 2009 to 2010.

Toner did not elaborate on the nighttime posting but stressed that the volume of messages being made public Monday exceeded the approximately 6,000 pages released thus far.

“We’re producing more documents this month than we have in the previous three releases in May, June and July combined,” he told reporters. “Meeting this goal is really a testament to our commitment to releasing these emails to the public as expeditiously as possible.”

The last nighttime release of Clinton’s emails, in June, prompted questions of whether the State Department was trying to minimize the impact of bad news. State spokesman John Kirby on Monday denied that, saying that the timing was the product of the volume of emails to be processed and posted, and a monthly deadline set by a federal judge. However, Kirby apologized for the inconvenience the nighttime posting caused for journalists and said his agency would seek to avoid such off-hours activity in the future.

The Intelligence Community inspector general has said at least two emails on Clinton’s account contained “top secret” information subject to special protection because it was derived from electronic or aerial surveillance. The State Department has disputed that conclusion. The FBI is also conducting an investigation of how the arguably classified material made it onto Clinton’s server.

Clinton has portrayed the furor over classification of her emails as unrelated to her decision to use a private email account, since classified information is not supposed to be sent on any system not approved for that purpose, whether private or government-owned.

“If I had had a separate government account … we would be going through the same process,” Clinton told reporters earlier this month at a news conference in Las Vegas. “It has nothing to do with me and it has nothing to do with the fact that my account was personal.”

While Clinton has repeatedly described the email controversy as one dwelled upon by journalists and her political opponents, she changed her tone somewhat last week, allowing that some members of the public do have legitimate questions about the issue. “I know people have raised questions about my email use as secretary of state, and I understand why,” she said at a campaign stop in Iowa. “My use of personal email was allowed by the State Department. It clearly wasn’t the best choice. … I take responsibility for that decision.”

The emails come from a set of about 54,000 pages of messages Clinton turned over to her former agency in December after a request from a top official there.

In May, the State Department released 847 pages from the emails relating to Benghazi and Libya more broadly that had been provided to the House Select Committee on Benghazi earlier in the year.

State initially proposed holding back the rest of Clinton’s emails until next January and releasing them in one large batch in response to pending Freedom of Information Act requests. However, U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras rejected that approach and ordered monthly releases from June through early next year.

In June, State released 3,095 pages, many of which highlighted the influence of outside Clinton adviser Sidney Blumenthal. but the pace of disclosures slowed with a July release of just 2,206 pages. State officials said the slowdown, which caused the agency to fall short of a goal set by Contreras, was the result of new procedures to make sure intelligence agencies were fully consulted about the content of emails planned for release.

Officials had said in court filings that they planned to make up some of the deficit this month and to be back on track by next month. However, the new release of more than 7,000 pages put the agency back in line with the judge’s order.

Clinton and her aides have suggested that as more of her emails are released, people will get a better sense of how she’s doing her job and the controversy will diminish. That may turn out to be true as the monthly releases continue into next year. However, for now, each round of disclosures provides new fodder for Republicans and other critics questioning the wisdom, propriety and even the legality of the arrangement.

10 things you need to know today: September 1, 2015

(AP Photo/Jim Mone)

THE WEEK

1. High Court says Kentucky clerk must issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples
The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a Kentucky county clerk’s request for permission to deny marriage licenses to same-sex couplesdue to her religious beliefs. The ruling does not end the challenge by the clerk, Kim Davis, but it means that she will have to start issuing the licenses, or face the possibility of being held in contempt, which could mean daily fines and even jail time. Davis, an Apostolic Christian, stopped issuing all marriages licenses after the court’s June 26 decision saying gay couples had a constitutional right to marry.

Source: USA Today

2. Latest batch of Clinton emails contains dozens with classified information
The State Department released 7,000 more pages of Hillary Clinton’s emails from her time as secretary of state, including 125 messages that had been redacted because they contained classified information. None of the emails were deemed classified when they were sent in 2009 and 2010, a State Department spokesman said. The release was the biggest yet under a monthly disclosure order ordered by a court after it was revealed Clinton had used a private email server as secretary of state.

Source: Reuters, The New York Times

3. Obama says politicians who don’t fight climate change aren’t “fit to lead”
President Obama on Monday called for world leaders to do more to fight climate change as he started a three-day tour of Alaska. Obama said nations around the world are facing more droughts, more floods, rising sea levels, and other problems, and unless stronger action is taken now we will “condemn our children to a world they will no longer have the capacity to repair.” He added that any politician “who refuses to take this issue seriously or treats it like a joke, is not fit to lead.”

Source: NBC News

4. Ben Carson catches Donald Trump in Iowa poll
Ben Carson pulled into a tie with Donald Trump in Iowa in the latest Monmouth University Poll released Monday, marking the first time that a GOP rival has closed the gap in Trump’s lead in the primary. Both Carson and Trump got 23 percent support from Iowa’s Republican voters, while former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina came in third with 10 percent of the vote. No other candidate in the Republican field had double-digit support.

Source: Time

5. Turkish court arrests three Vice News journalists covering Kurdish insurgents
A Turkish court on Monday ordered three Vice News journalists to beformally arrested on terrorism-related charges. The journalists — Iraqi national Mohammed Ismael Rasool, and Britons Jake Hanrahan and Philip Pendlebury — were detained covering Kurdish insurgents in the country’s southeast. The court said they had knowingly helped an armed terrorist organization. The New York-based media site called the charges “baseless and alarmingly false,” and said Turkey was trying to “intimidate and censor” the journalists.

Source: The Wall Street Journal

6. Blue Bell prepares to resume sales four months after listeria outbreak
Blue Bell Ice Cream announced Monday that it was preparing to return its products to store shelves four months after shutting down production over a listeria outbreak that was linked to three deaths. “We have been working diligently to prepare our facilities to resume test production, and our focus throughout this process has been to ensure the public that when our products return to market, they are safe,” said Greg Bridges, Blue Bell’s vice president of operations.

Source: ABC News

7. Anti-Semite convicted of Kansas triple murder
Frazier Glenn Cross was convicted of capital murder on Monday for killing three people at a Kansas Jewish community center and nearby assisted living facility. The jury now moves on to the sentencing phase of the trial to decide whether to call for the death penalty. The 74-year-old Cross — also known as Frazier Glenn Miller Jr. — had a history of anti-Semitic and white supremacist beliefs. He was thought to be targeting Jews, although the victims were not Jewish.

Source: CNN

8. Thailand arrests second suspect over Bangkok bombing
Thai security forces made a second arrest in connection with the Erawan Shrine bombing that killed 20 people in Bangkok on Aug. 17, the head of Thailand’s military government, Gen. Prayuth Chan-ocha, said Tuesday. The second suspect is a foreign man, although police did not release his identity. He was detained at Thailand’s border with Cambodia. Authorities also have issued an arrest warrant for a 27-year-old woman from a Muslim area in southern Thailand, although her family said she moved to Turkey weeks before the bombing.

Source: The New York Times

9. Stocks fall after China releases weak manufacturing data
World stocks and commodity prices fell sharply on Tuesday as weak manufacturing data from Chinese deepened fears of the health of the world’s second largest economy. Global markets had rebounded somewhat over the last several trading days, but on Tuesday European markets opened down by as much as 2.5 percent after Asian stocks fell. U.S. stock futures fell by 1.5 percent overnight after comments from Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Stanley Fischer suggested the central bank would go ahead with an interest rate hike in September.

Source: Reuters

10. Murder rates rise in numerous U.S. cities
Rates of murder and other violent crimes have risen sharply this year in more than 30 U.S. cities. For example, there have been 136 murders in St. Louis, up from 85 the same time last year. In New Orleans, the number has jumped to 120, compared to 98 last year. Washington has gone from 73 murders at this point last year to 105 this year, and Baltimore has gone from 138 to 215. Authorities disagree on the causes, and blame everything from gang drug-turf fights to less aggressive policing due to scrutiny over the use of force.

Source: The New York Times

Harold Maass

Ted Cruz Blames Obama For Ambush Murder Of Harris County Texas Deputy

ted_cruz

POLITICUS USA

While campaigning in New Hampshire, Texas Senator Ted Cruz accused Barack Obama of inciting the ambush murder of Harris County Deputy Darren Gofourth. Gofourth was shot 15 times while pumping gas in Houston Texas Friday evening.

Senator Cruz tried to exploit the murder to score political points with Republicans, by assigning blame to President Obama. The Texas Senator lashed out, saying:

Cops across this country are feeling the assault. They’re feeling the assault from the president, from the top on down, as we see — whether it’s in Ferguson or Baltimore, the response from senior officials, the president or the attorney general, is to vilify law enforcement. That’s wrong. It’s fundamentally wrong. It’s endangering all of our safety and security.

Senator Cruz is of course misrepresenting President Obama’s attitudes towards law enforcement officers. While the president has been critical of abusive police conduct, he has not vilified law enforcement officers, nor has he denigrated their chosen profession. The president supports police officers who lawfully carry out their responsibilities.

For example, in a May memorial for fallen officers, President Obama had this to say about police officers:

Your jobs are inherently dangerous. The reminders are too common. We cannot erase every darkness or danger from the duty that you’ve chosen. We can offer you the support you need to be safer. We can make the communities you care about and protect safer as well.

Most of all we can say thank you. We can say we appreciate you and we’re grateful for the work you do every day.

Furthermore, contrary to right-wing mythology, the president also has been harshly critical of violent anti-police protests, arguing that there is no excuse for demonstrations that turn violent.

For example, during the Baltimore protests, following Freddie Gray’s death in police custody, President Obama argued:

There’s no excuse for the kind of violence that we saw yesterday. It is counterproductive. When individuals get crowbars and start prying open doors to loot, they’re not protesting, they’re not making a statement, they’re stealing.

When NYPD police officers Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos were murdered in December 2014, Obama stated unequivocally:

I unconditionally condemn today’s murder of two police officers in New York City. Two brave men won’t be going home to their loved ones tonight, and for that, there is no justification.

Ted Cruz is desperately trying to paint President Barack Obama as some kind of anti-cop radical who vilifies police officers, but that false caricature bears no connection to reality. The simple fact that President Obama expects law enforcement officers to follow the law they are entrusted with enforcing, does not mean he is anti-police. It means he supports the police and appreciates those who perform their job in a professional and lawful manner. Holding police officers to that standard is neither anti-police nor is it an incitement to murder.

Only in Ted Cruz’s twisted mind, can Barack Obama be called anything other than supportive of responsible law enforcement officers in America. Nothing the president has said or done should give any reason for a rational person to believe that he is encouraging the senseless unprovoked murder of police officers.

Keith Brekhus