Marco Rubio’s Epic Fail as the Aspiring Hero of 2016

PoliticusUSA

“What the GOP will never learn – Tea Party to establishment – is that smiling while giving the finger to the American [people] doesn’t change the message and I think we all get the GOP’s message in giving us Marco Rubio.”

It hasn’t been a good week for Republican Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL). First, Ann Coulter called him the Doctor Kervorkian of the Republican Party for supporting immigration reform.

Then, on Sunday, Rubio embarrassed himself – badly – by suggesting a Bushian Syria policy that depends on finding the good guys and working with them.

That wasn’t all, for another hammer was about to fall, this wielded by fellow Republican, California’s Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, who said, “Rubio is so mixed up and so confused. I think he has given up his rightful place to advise any of us in Washington what to do, and he’s given up any right to be trusted by the American people.”

That’s language usually reserved by Republicans for President Obama.

Seriously, criticism by a Republican doesn’t get any worse than that.

Rubio’s mistake was saying,

Let’s be clear. Nobody is talking about preventing the legalization. The legalization is going to happen. That means the following will happen: First comes the legalization. Then come the measures to secure the border. And then comes the process of permanent residence.

Rohrabacher did a Coulter in response to this:

This is just a lot of weasel words that Rubio and these people are throwing in. They’re going to legalize the status of people here illegally. Once they do that, that is an amnesty. And once they do that, there will be no border security improvements. It’ll all be a facade.

Let’s not forget that in May, Rubio, apparently channeling Sarah Palin, demanded that the non-existent IRS Commissioner resign. Or that in April he was forced to admit he opposed a gun control bill that he hadn’t even bothered to read.

It wasn’t long ago that Marco Rubio was the bright young hero of the Republican Party, a young McCarthy in the making (which alone should have endeared him to Ann Coulter) and a potential 2016 candidate and the GOP’s access to the Hispanic vote – even though he was less popular with Hispanics than President George W. Bush (29 to 23 percent).

At this point, any Hispanic votes garnered by Rubio would be offset by the loss of the racist lily-white base.

Let’s face it: these people did not want a black man in the White House. They are not going to stand for a Hispanic.

As Jason Easley wrote here in April, “Only a party that is operating from a completely race based mindset would think that the elevation of Marco Rubio to Hispanic show pony/gimmick is a good idea.”

Clearly, making Rubio the face of immigration reform has backfired and he has become a target of ridicule instead, not all of it related to immigration but all of it due to any discernible ability to articulate his politics and beliefs.

The GOP hasn’t clued in to a glaring defect in their thinking: that it is difficult to position yourself as a champion of minorities while fielding dullards as your point-men or women and while being pushed into the KKK section of the political landscape by Tea Party racists and moralizing religious fanatics.

To be fair, Marco Rubio never stood a chance of succeeding in his appointed role as Hispanic Messiah. Even in March, the bigoted Rand Paul was leading Rubio in polls, showing the base really doesn’t care when establishment Republicans think. And that fact might itself be irrelevant as neither man stands a chance against Hilary Clinton.

A worse harbinger yet, Nate Silver, who predicted the outcome of the 2012 election, pointed to Rubio as being as unelectable as Mitt Romney.

At this point, Rubio seems more a sacrificial lamb than the eternal hero, that security guy on Star Trek away teams whose sole job it is to be killed. Using Rubio in that way would at least have shown some method to the GOP’s madness but that sort of credit is undeserved.

They seem really to have genuinely thought their initial impressions after catastrophic defeat in 2012 that some charisma would make their stupidity look good, was a workable strategy. The GOP seems to abound with charismatic young men saying truly reprehensible things.

What the GOP will never learn – Tea Party to establishment – is that smiling while giving the finger to the American [people] doesn’t change the message and I think we all get the GOP’s message in giving us Marco Rubio.

4 comments

  1. Reblogged this on Elect2Care and commented:
    It’s validating to see that even the GOP recognizes the lack of, um, intelligence in some of its candidates. Let’s see if he has the sense to back off or too big an ego to pay heed.

    Like

    1. Let’s see if he has the sense to back off or too big an ego to pay heed.

      Janswrite, we’re talking about a Republican here, so my guess is – he doesn’t have enough sense to even recognize what a ditz he is.

      Like

  2. Rubio definitely seems to have failed the GOP litmus-testing. Now, let’s see how long it takes for Ted Cruz of Texas to talk too much.

    Like

  3. This would be sad to see…except that I don’t mind the Republicans continuing with their suicidal politics. Hey, if they don’t want to attract Hispanics, no need to try.

    Like

Comments are closed.