Has the NRA lost it entirely?

Has the NRA lost it entirely?

This article speaks to the NRA’s ad that targets Sasha and Malia Obama. (The announcer calls them: “the president’s kids”.)

Salon – Joan Walsh

While Obama signs 23 executive orders on gun control, the organization takes a bizarre shot at his family

On the eve of President Obama announcing his gun control agenda, based on Vice President Joe Biden’s task force recommendations, the National Rifle Association needed to go big: to remind Americans that the organization protects their gun rights, and to remind politicians that they’re a smart and formidable political force they’d be unwise to cross.

Instead, they showed us the truth: They’re part of the vast and increasingly incompetent right-wing conspiracy that’s sacrificed its own effectiveness for the pleasure of hating Democrats generally and our first black president in particular.

You’ve either seen or read about the ad: A narrator intones, “Are the president’s kids more important than yours?” (Huh? you might say.) “Then why is he skeptical about putting armed security in our schools when his kids are protected by armed guards at their schools? Mr. Obama demands the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes, but he’s just another elitist hypocrite when it comes to a fair share of security.”

Of course, the NRA ignores the common-sense answer to its own question: Every president’s child is protected by armed guards. They’re called the Secret Service. Outside of the fever swamps of anti-Obama hatred, no one could possibly have a problem with that, let alone call it hypocrisy.

Just the way Fox News’ insularity and reality denial has been a form of media and political malpractice, harming its viewers by shielding them from the Obama victory to come in 2012, the NRA has disabled itself by wallowing in anti-Obama hatred and paranoia.  On the eve of the president’s big stand, when they most needed to show their supposedly formidable political muscle, instead they showed that they’re completely tone-deaf and politically silly. That’s because they’ve been marinating in the bile of Obama’s enemies, where the president’s modest moves on guns, in the wake of the Newtown massacre, are a trigger to call for his impeachment – thanks, Ed Meese, Mr. Iran-Contra! – or worse.

And on that fringe, of course, everyone knows the president is just a big fat elitist hypocrite. Over on that fringe, Sasha and Malia Obama don’t elicit feelings of tenderness and protectiveness like they do in the rest of the country. They elicit feelings of contempt, as the children of “elitist hypocrites,” if they provoke any feelings at all.

In the real world, we know that our first black president has faced more assassination threats than any president in history, and that the Secret Service has a particularly tough job protecting him and his family. In the NRA’s world, wingnuts pray for his death with Psalm 109, which asks God, “may his children be fatherless and his wife a widow” and “may no one … take pity on his fatherless children.)

And no, I’m not quoting some lone NewsMax commenter or a Breitbart blogger’s tweet: The verse has been popular among right-wing ministers and politicians since Obama’s inauguration. It’s spawned bumper stickers. Almost exactly a year ago, Kansas’ Republican House Speaker Mike O’Neal was emailing it around to his political allies. “At last — I can honestly voice a Biblical prayer for our president! Look it up — it is word for word! Let us all bow our heads and pray. Brothers and Sisters, can I get an AMEN? AMEN!!!!!!” O’Neal refused to apologize. Then he apologized. Then he retired. Wayne LaPierre might want to look to O’Neal for inspiration.

To be fair, maybe the NRA is simply saying that every child in America should be protected by an armed guard, like Sasha and Malia Obama are. That would be consistent with LaPierre’s creepy maxim: “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” (More to the point: That would sell a hell of a lot of guns, the NRA’s real goal.) In reality, though, the ad springs from a reflexive belief that most Americans share LaPierre’s contempt for the president.

We don’t, Wayne. We just reelected him. He’s the first president since Dwight Eisenhower to get more than 50 percent of the vote twice. Your hatred is blurring your vision and hurting your political aim. That’s bad for the NRA but it’s good for the rest of us.

12 Comments

Filed under Gun Lobby, NRA, President Barack Obama

12 responses to “Has the NRA lost it entirely?

  1. Great blog post. You might be interested in reading my blog post today questioning the legitimacy of the NRA’s membership base. You can find it here: http://raisequestions.wordpress.com/2013/01/16/my-cat-is-a-member-of-the-nra/

    Like this

  2. Reblogged this on The ObamaCrat.Com™ and commented:
    Yes They Have.

    Like this

  3. Reblogged this on A View From The Middle (Class) and commented:
    The NRA is catching tons of heat from all sides — even the conservative side — lately. And there’s a good reason for that. This is definitely not “your grandfather’s” NRA any more. Questioning the sensibility of protecting a President’s children goes beyond stupidity, straight into lunacy.

    Like this

  4. Reblogged this on 2012 Spirit In Action and commented:
    Thank you for sharing this-I am at a complete loss to understand the mindset of people who say they want to make a better world, then proceed by attacking children, promoting violence and working to divide our country over miniscule details-we survived the assault weapons ban before and no one, outside of Waco I suppose, had any problem with it. But then I am thinking Waco would have been similar even if the nutty guy had more or more dangerous weapons-being firebombed is awfully effective against most things it seems;-/

    Like this

  5. After NRA had worked so hard to arm those very people who make death threats to Obama, they are still surprised that Obama may want armed protection.

    Like this

  6. Trevor

    I don’t think this is anything new for the NRA. The Washington Post recently had a phenomenal description of how the NRA, formerly a sportsmen’s association, was taken over by aggressive gun lobbyists. It’s an excellent read. http://www.washingtonpost.com?wpmk=MK0000205

    Like this

  7. Reblogged this on cadesertvoice and commented:
    Yes, the NRA and the GOP have completely lost it!

    Like this

  8. There is a segment of the population which wants to see Pres. Obama and his family dead.

    Apparently the NRA speaks for them.

    How long before the SPLC lists the NRA as a hate group? I already have. This is not a sportsmen’s association committed to teaching marksmanship and gun safety. They’re aggressively and violently crazed.

    Like this