Ann Romney: ‘We’ve Given All You People Need To Know’ About Family Finances

Ann Romney

The unmitigated gall of this “privileged” woman is rather unpleasant, in my view.  The “all you people…” part is what’s so damned unacceptable here…

The Huffington Post

Mitt Romney’s wife is reinforcing her husband’s refusal to make public several years of tax returns, saying “we’ve given all you people need to know” about the family’s finances.

“You know, you should really look at where Mitt has led his life, and where he’s been financially,” she said. “He’s a very generous person. We give 10 percent of our income to our church every year. Do you think that is the kind of person who is trying to hide things, or do things? No. He is so good about it. Then, when he was governor of Massachusetts, didn’t take a salary for four years.”

Ann Romney told ABC News she thinks the Obama campaign’s attacks on her husband have been “beneath the dignity of the presidency.” And she said people will decide whom to vote for based on whether their lives would be better under Mitt Romney than President Barack Obama.

She said that ultimately she believes voters are “going to fire the coach.”

CORRECTION: The original version of this article omitted the word “people” from Ann Romney’s quote.

See video here…

8 Comments

Filed under U.S. Politics

8 responses to “Ann Romney: ‘We’ve Given All You People Need To Know’ About Family Finances

  1. “You People…” Really Ann? That statement alone is pregnant with conceit, contempt, and arrogance.

    Like this

  2. All of us peasants should stop pestering our betters and accept that they deserve power just ’cause they’re rich.

    Like this

  3. In what world would the integrity of a presidential candidate be irrelevant? In what world would the spouse of the candidate, the presidential candidate and his talking heads think that the release of those his returns are none of the Americans populace business yet when he hired people for Bain I can assure you he went through ALL of their financial history, and Credit ratings, checked for facts in their resumes. In what world would it be acceptable to have a former governor destroy his computer, delete all evidence of his emails as though there were information contained that he did not want the world to know and knowone is supposed tyo question him about it? In what world would a presidential candidate have the gall to say we should discuss the finances of the poor behind closed doors out of the ear shot of those poor? The answer to those questions is only in Romneyworld…
    Anyone for a one way ticket to a oligarchy run by plutocrats just need to vote for Mitt…

    Like this

  4. Reblogged this on Drayton's Gazette and commented:
    In what world would the integrity of a presidential candidate be irrelevant? In what world would the spouse of the candidate, the presidential candidate and his talking heads think that the release of those his returns are none of the Americans populace business yet when he hired people for Bain I can assure you he went through ALL of their financial history, and Credit ratings, checked for facts in their resumes. In what world would it be acceptable to have a former governor destroy his computer, delete all evidence of his emails as though there were information contained that he did not want the world to know and knowone is supposed tyo question him about it? In what world would a presidential candidate have the gall to say we should discuss the finances of the poor behind closed doors out of the ear shot of those poor? The answer to those questions is only in Romneyworld…
    Anyone for a one way ticket to a oligarchy run by plutocrats just need to vote for Mitt…

    Like this