Daily Archives: January 30, 2012
Bill Maher Wants To Know: ‘Who The F@#k Is Saul Alinsky?’
I saw this week’s Bill Maher Show and it was rather disappointing because Bill’s two right-wing guests dominated the show.
I specifically watched to see political commentator and host Martin Bashir who’s afternoon show on MSNBC is my number one DVR priority for that time slot. However, Mr. Bashir hardly got a word in because of the two aforementioned extremely talkative wing-nuts.
However, Bill Maher did indeed score big on his question and then analysis on Saul Alinsky, the guy Newt Gingrich, Glenn Beck, and Fox News always compare the President to on their programs…
Mediaite
One of Newt Gingrich‘s most bizarre lines of attack against liberals and President Obama is that they’re basically working from the playbook of Saul Alinsky. This has been a rally cry of his for months now. Most of us who aren’t that aware of early 20th century political activists have no idea who the hell Saul Alinsky is, but luckily, Bill Maher gave everyone a primer on who this insidious man is on his show tonight. And what he discovered is that it’s not just Newt Gingrich, but also Glenn Beck, who has turned Alinsky into the latest liberal boogeyman.
Maher joked that for Alinsky to garner the ire of Newt, he must be a divorce lawyer or something. And he admitted that even as a member of the evil liberal media, he had no idea who the actual fuck this person is. But after a quick Wikpedia search, Maher realized that Alinsky is best known for being a civil rights advocate in the 1950s. Like the president, Alinsky was a community organizer, but the chances of them ever swapping notes are pretty slim, mostly because Alinsky died during Obama’s preteen years.
But the Alinsky line of attack was not the main target of Maher’s new rule, but rather the Republican attempts to paint Obama as someone he is clearly not. Maher went down the list of attacks (including a small dig at Dana Rohrabacher‘s comments from earlier in the show).
“This is how politics has changed. You used to run against an actual president. But now you just recreate him inside the bubble and run against your new fictional candidate.”
Maher argued that as partisan and occasionally hyperbolic as George W. Bush‘s critics were, at least they were attacking the actual person. But for Gingrich to actually accuse Obama of being “anti-work,” Maher suspected Republicans were operating on “a paranoid feeling about what he might do.”
Watch the video below, courtesy of HBO:
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bill-maher-wants-to-know-who-the-fk-is-saul-alinsky/
Related articles
- Bill Maher: ‘Who the Fuck is Saul Alinsky?’ and Who is This ‘Barack X’ Republicans Are Running Against? (bradblog.com)
- Saul Alinsky: A True American Exceptionalist (mykeystrokes.com)
- Who is Saul Alinsky? (newsy.com)
- Who is Saul Alinsky, and why is Newt Gingrich so obsessed with him? – Christian Science Monitor (csmonitor.com)
- Will the Real Saul Alinsky Please Stand Up? (caelumetterra.wordpress.com)
- ‘Real Time’ Panel Goes Nuts Trying To Convince Bill Maher Obama Is Anti-Military (mediaite.com)
- The Republicans, Not The Democrats Are Following Europe (eoghann.com)
- Martin Bashir Exposes The Great Republican Hoax (crooksandliars.com)
Comments Off
Filed under Newt Gingrich
All In Favor Of Public Hangings, Say “Aye”
As usual Mario Piperni sees things more clearly and logically than the Republicans he draws in his illustrations. He writes about their weird and sometimes crazy antics and depicts it perfectly with his drawings.
There’s no secret that I am a die-hard Piperni fan. Here’s yet another example…
Mario Piperni
From the compassionate conservative wing of the Republican party, Rep. Larry Pittman of North Carolina speaks out .
“We need to make the death penalty a real deterrent again by actually carrying it out. Every appeal that can be made should have to be made at one time, not in a serial manner,” Pittman wrote in the email. “If murderers (and I would include abortionists, rapists, and kidnappers, as well) are actually executed, it will at least have the deterrent effect upon them. For my money, we should go back to public hangings, which would be more of a deterrent to others, as well.”
How long before execution by guillotine for liberals and atheists is proposed by Republicans?
The surprise or concern is not that wingnut politicians say stuff like this. Republicans have been running on CRAZY for a while now. No, the real worry should be that enough Americans voted for this guy to get him elected.
Related articles
- North Carolina GOP Lawmaker Calls For Bringing Back Public Hangings, Starting With Abortion Providers | ThinkProgress (tribuneofthepeople.com)
- North Carolina GOP Lawmaker Calls For Bringing Back Public Hangings, Starting With Abortion Providers (thinkprogress.org)
- North Carolina Politician Calls For Public Hanging Of Abortion Providers (thefrisky.com)
- Public Hangings: Bring Em On (alan.com)
- Justice And A Call For Public Hangings (skydancingblog.com)
- This week in the War on Women: Public hangings, rape is a gift from God, and cream of fetus soup (dailykos.com)
Filed under GOP Radicalism
