I’m certain that this is one of the best kept open secrets in politics…
Think Progress
In 2009, just 1 percent of respondents to National Business Ethics Survey — a large industry study funded by major corporations like Walmart — said they had witnessed illegal corporate political donations. This year, that number quadrupled to 4 percent. Management-level employees at large, publicly traded companies were most likely to see the illegal activity, with seven percent of senior managers saying they had witnessed it.
While it’s unclear exactly what caused the spike, Roll Call reports it may have to do with increasingly lax campaign finance laws in the wake of the Citizens United Supreme Court decision:
“If these numbers are quadrupling, it is eye-popping,” said Kenneth Gross, a lawyer with Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom’s political law practice who advises corporate clients on government affairs compliance. “Possibly the relaxed laws on giving have pervaded … the workplace, giving people the impression that things aren’t as strict as they were.”
Although it is not clear what led to the spike, there is no question that the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which opened the door to unlimited political spending by unions and corporations, has dramatically changed the landscape of political giving in the business world, heightening pressure on fundraisers to rake in big sums from new sources.
Meanwhile, employees reported a similar increase in observing bribes and improper payments to public officials that violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).
Related articles
- Back to the Robber Barons (nytimes.com)
- Montana Supreme Court Brushes Aside ‘Citizens United’ (huffingtonpost.com)
- Republican National Committee: Helping Democrats in Need (blogs.wsj.com)
- The Rap Against Super PACs (reason.com)
- Campaign Stops: Where Did They Get the Money For That? (campaignstops.blogs.nytimes.com)
- Who is Defending the Honor of the “Political Marketplace”? (belowthesaltblog.wordpress.com)
- Criticisms United (thenewprint.com)
- SCOTUS upholds foreign money ban (politico.com)
What if shareholders vote to prevent our companies from giving our money to ANY political candidate or PAC, and give the money back to us in our dividends instead? How can we start a national conversation about this?
Reblogged this on @lissnup and commented:
4% with the guts to tell the truth. How many more know about it and lie?
Thanks lissnup!
What if shareholders vote to prevent our companies from giving our money to ANY political candidate or PAC, and give the money back to us in our dividends instead? How can we start a national conversation about this?
You just started it, Alice!