When I initially read this story, my jaw had become semi-paralyzed in an open position. Talk about “jaw-dropping” moments, this story is astounding.
I am certainly no fan of Tom Coburn ever since Rachel Maddow exposed Coburn as being complicit in trying to hide the John Ensign scandal.
However, he may have earned a small bit of redemption by telling the following story. The emphasis are mine…
The Huffington Post
Millionaires are receiving billions in taxpayer-funded support every year that helps them pay for everything from child care to bad debts to boats and vacation homes, according to a report released Monday by Sen. Tom Coburn.
People who individually earned more than a million dollars in 2009 even managed to collect a total of nearly $21 million in unemployment insurance.
“From tax write-offs for gambling losses, vacation homes, and luxury yachts to subsidies for their ranches and estates, the government is subsidizing the lifestyles of the rich and famous,” wrote Coburn, an Oklahoma Republican, in an accompanying letter. “Multimillionaires are even receiving government checks for not working. This welfare for the well-off — costing billions of dollars a year — is being paid for with the taxes of the less fortunate.”
Calling the giveaways “sheer Washington stupidity,” Coburn detailed in the study more than $30 billion a year that comes out of the U.S. Treasury to aid people who make more than a million a year.
For Coburn, who describes his survey as the first-ever compilation of federal aid for the richest, such a startling figure makes no sense when most of the country is struggling to get by. He also thinks it reveals some sensible targets for Congress’ stymied debt-trimming super committee.
“Even in these difficult times, the United States remains a land of opportunity and not everyone is in need of government handouts,” wrote Coburn in the accompanying letter.
“The income of the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans has risen dramatically over the last decade. Yet, the federal government lavishes these millionaires with billions of dollars in giveaways and tax breaks,” he wrote, referring to the growing income gap recently documented in stark fashion by the Congressional Budget Office.
“The government’s social safety net, which has long existed to catch those who are down and help them get back up, is now being used as a hammock by some millionaires, some who are paying less taxes than average middle class families,” Coburn contended.
And what the report “reveals is sheer Washington stupidity with government policies pampering the wealthy costing taxpayers billions of dollars every year,” Coburn argued.
Coburn totaled up all the federal money for millionaires over several years that his office could find. Among the handouts for the well-heeled are:
- $18.15 million in child care tax credits
- $74 million in unemployment checks
- $89 million for preservation of ranches and estates
- $316 million in farm subsidies
- $608 million in business entertainment deductions
- $9 billion in retirement checks
- $21 billion in gambling losses
- $28 billion in mortgage breaks for mansions, vacation homes and yachts
Some of the payments, such as for Social Security and Medicare, stem from payroll taxes and are not means-tested when they are paid out. Advocates of such payments believe the government made a promise to individuals that it must keep, regardless of their wealth.
Some other payments, such as the millions received by the wealthy to preserve land or to use alternative energy sources, arise from programs that proponents consider beneficial overall, even if the rich get the money.
But Coburn doesn’t see much justification for these payments, considering how well the wealthy have done over the last 30 years compared to everyone else. “Fleecing the taxpayer while contributing nothing is not the American way,” he wrote.
He also sees policies that help the rich avoid taxes as government-sanctioned redistribution of wealth.
“Americans are generous and do not want to see their fellow citizens go without basic necessities. Likewise, we expect everyone to contribute and to demonstrate personal responsibility,” Coburn wrote.
“Government policies intended to mainstream wealth redistribution are undermining these principles. The tragic irony is the wealth in these cases is trickling up rather than down the economic ladder,” he continued. “The cost of this largess will thus be shared by those struggling today and the next generation who will inherit $15 trillion of debt that threatens the future of the American Dream.”
Coburn does not argue that taxes should be raised on the wealthy, however. Simply ending giveaways for people who don’t need them would help, and he recommends limiting or cutting payments to millionaires in the safety net programs; ending farm and conservation payments to the rich; means-testing tax breaks and other payouts; and reforming provisions of the tax code that help pay for vacation properties and mansions.
Related articles
- Tom Coburn: Feds Pay Out Billions In ‘Welfare For Well-Off’ (huffingtonpost.com)
- Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Stars (politics.blogs.foxnews.com)
- Handouts for Millionaires (politicalwire.com)
- Welfare for Millionaires (thedailybeast.com)
- Coburn Suggests Taking Care of The ‘Frail Elderly’ Is Unconstitutional Because ‘That’s A Family Responsibility’ (kaystreet.wordpress.com)
- Big stars named in Coburn report on tax subsidies (cbsnews.com)
- Coburn Proposes Ending Tribal Tax Exempt Bonds, CDFI Funding, Tax Credits (indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com)

This information is mind numbing. To think that those of us who struggle daily to maintain our minimal life support mechanisms: food, clothing, and shelter are being fleeced by those who appear to enjoy basting the rich (as one might when roasting turkey to keep it moist) as if they had no resources at all.
If they are smart enough, or lucky enough to be worth more than a million, it stands to reason (to the logical mind) that they are crafty enough to maneuver themselves out of tight straights WITHOUT we, the 99% being asked, or not, to subsidize their missteps. Gambling, to mention just one atrocity, since when is that a well we, the taxpayers, should throw our money down?
I thought commenting would defuse my anger yet, it has had the opposite effect, thus I need a shower to wash away this accumulation of filth which has been heaped upon, and against the struggling amongst us.
Thanks for shining a light on that which I have missed in the news.
Thanks for shining a light on that which I have missed in the news.
You’re welcome Tenfeet. This information will not be leaked by the corporate media. It’s like you described it: mind numbing. With so many of us in the 99% struggling on a day to day basis to maintain a semblance of normalcy in our lives, millionaires are getting what is essentially welfare on top of their millions. THIRTY BILLION DOLLARS worth, A YEAR!
I commend Tom Coburn for revealing this info. He says he still doesn’t want to raise taxes, but felt these “perks” (my description) should be cut from the budget in lieu of some real safety nets for the middle class.
I told you he wasn’t as bad as you thought! LOL….
I’ve seen him exhibit humanity a couple of times. First of all, he does not bad mouth the President. He doesn’t agree with him on much of anything, but they have an odd friendship. Secondly, when other people have said lousy things about the President and I think it was Nancy Pelosi, he stood up to those critics (at a Town Hall meeting?) and said they were good people. My memory is fuzzy but I remember discussing this with you in the past. He drives me absolutely nuts on the Senate floor. He’s always holding things up….but I do have to say that I agree with means testing for a lot of the give aways. Before my mom with in assisted living, she could have afforded a higher medicare premium than some person who barely had enough to eat, and she would have paid it with no complaint and still been able to live a very full life, doing whatever she wished.
Hey Democratista, my friend!
Yes, once again, you were right about Sen. Coburn and you were also right about then Sen. Obama when he was a presidential candidate. I had my doubts about him and after listening to you give me a lot of reasons why I should vote for him, I did some more research on Obama and found you were absolutely right about him.
So given your history of political knowledge, I’ll give Coburn a second look.
As I said in the above article, I have nothing but praise for him exposing the waste and most likely fraud in the millionaire entitlements program.
It’s great to see you again Demo.
Pingback: Your tax dollars for the rich and famous? (CBS News) « The Communicator