Birther Civil War Breaks Out Over Marco Rubio

Photo of Marco Rubio taken on April 14, 2008 i...

Image via Wikipedia

I love it when birthers throw each other under the bus…

The Huffington Post

It’s a given that at some point in the future, Barack Obama will not be the president of the United States. That time may come sooner than Democrats want, or later than Republicans fear, but it will come all the same, and there will be a new president. Perhaps even a Republican president! And so like many of you, I’ve been wondering about what happens to the Birther movement in a post-Obama era. (If you’ve not been wondering about this, feel free to click here to learn more about cooking with bourbon, America’s most important foodstuff.)

In my mind, I’ve always imagined that the chances of Birtherism continuing much beyond Obama’s presidency were small. And I never thought for one minute that the Birthers would demand similar scrutiny of a Republican candidate for president. But it turns out I may have been wrong about this, because as Wonkette reports, there’s some sort of Birther schism emerging over the Oval Office prospects of Senator Marco Rubio (R-Fla.).

In one corner, we have Lawrence Sellin, a former Army reserve officer who seems to have parlayed getting dismissed from his position as a staffer to General David Petraeus in Afghanistan (for criticizing his superiors and making fun of their PowerPoint presentations) into a career of writing Birther tracts for something called the Canada Free Press. He’s been something of a fixture in the movement ever since, and is undeterred in his dementia despite this year’s release of Obama’s long sought-after “long form birth certificate.” Now, he’s targeting Rubio:

Continue reading FULL article HERE

Related articles

11 Comments

Filed under Marco Rubio

11 Responses to Birther Civil War Breaks Out Over Marco Rubio

  1. It is my opinion that the “birthers” lost their credibility by going after Obama for what amounted to an overblown frenzy of ingnorance and a large dose of stupidity.

    I am by no means a supporter of the Obama regime, but found the whole birther movement to be nothing more than a bunch of conservative nuts who went to the extremes to trash Obama’s name. It was a total and complete waste of time and energy. The only way to properly get rid of this president is to be sure that voters are informed and use their power of choice in the voting booth.

    Now they are apparently going after Marco Rubio. These “birthers” are beginning to show a pattern that is perhaps bordering on something other than where someone was born. I’ll just leave it at that.

    Thank you for sharing my post, “Marco Rubio: Vice President?”

  2. It is my opinion that the “birthers” lost their credibility by going after Obama for what amounted to an overblown frenzy of ingnorance and a large dose of stupidity.

    Hi J. Roycroft. Your take on “birthers” is spot on in my opinion.

    You are welcome to post here at any time. We don’t care about one’s ideology or party affiliation. We simply love a good debate.

    Thanks for your post.

  3. Obama was born in Hawaii. However, he was also adopted.

  4. I think a lot of the “birthers” are drowning.

    Yes, drowning in their own bile. (Pardon the graphic details.)

  5. By the way, your post came up from WordPress and I’m glad it did. It’s a pleasure to meet a well rounded Libertarian. :)