I saw this interview and was astounded at Ms. Rice’s beligerance when answering Mr. O’Donnell’s questions. It appears she stuck to the BushCo talking points and would not give her own interpretation of the events prior to and immediately after 9/11/2001.
Rachel Maddow’s response to Ms. Rice’s interview with Lawrence O’Donnell:
Related Articles
- Lawrence O’Donnell Confronts Condoleeza Rice On Going to War Under False Premises (alan.com)
- Lawrence O’Donnell’s Epic Slap-Fight With Condoleezza Rice Over Iraq And Al Qaeda (mediaite.com)
- Jon Stewart Changes Lawrence O’Donnell’s Mind On Releasing Osama Death Photos (mediaite.com)
- Lawrence O’Donnell: I’m ‘Filled With Dissatisfaction’ About Limits Of My Show (huffingtonpost.com)
- Lawrence O’Donnell: ‘Disgusting Is Way Too Nice A Word For Glenn Beck’ (VIDEO) (huffingtonpost.com)
- Lawrence O’Donnell On Hosting: ‘I Can’t Look Up And Imagine Myself Doing This For Three Years’ (mediaite.com)
- Condoleezza: Saddam Was a Threat (newser.com)
MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell Interviews Former Secretary Of State Condoleezza Rice
I saw this interview and was astounded at Larry’s (knucklehead) beligerance when interviewing Ms. Rice. It appears he stuck to the MSNBC talking points of constant stupid comments. A real bozo!
Welcome Dick Dover. I believe it was NY Senator Pat Moynihan that once said: Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. Lawrence O’Donnell needed no talking points. He simply tried to get Ms. Rice to say, “yes, we made some mistakes.” That never happened. That has to be frustrating for any commentator.
By the way, what is it about people who tend to lean toward right wing ideaology? They always seem to have a need to call people who oppose their views the most ridiculous names. It’s almost as they KNOW that they are really the losers but just HAVE to project that personality deficit on to others, with whom they disagree. Tsk tsk.